Shinkarev V P, Wraight C A
Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801-3837, USA.
Biophys J. 1997 May;72(5):2304-19. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78875-1.
The kinetics of light-induced electron transfer in reaction centers (RCs) from the purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides were studied in the presence of the detergent lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide (LDAO). After the light-induced electron transfer from the primary donor (P) to the acceptor quinone complex, the dark re-reduction of P+ reflects recombination from the reduced acceptor quinones, QA- or QB-. The secondary quinone, QB, which is loosely bound to the RC, determines the rate of this process. Electron transfer to QB slows down the return of the electron to P+, giving rise to a slow phase of the recovery kinetics with time tau P approximately 1 s, whereas charge recombination in RCs lacking QB generates a fast phase with time tau AP approximately 0.1 s. The amount of quinone bound to RC micelles can be reduced by increasing the detergent concentration. The characteristic time of the slow component of P+ dark relaxation, observed at low quinone content per RC micelle (at high detergent concentration), is about 1.2-1.5 s, in sharp contrast to expectations from previous models, according to which the time of the slow component should approach the time of the fast component (about 0.1 s) when the quinone concentration approaches zero. To account for this large discrepancy, a new quantitative approach has been developed to analyze the kinetics of electron transfer in isolated RCs with the following key features: 1) The exchange of quinone between different micelles (RC and detergent micelles) occurs more slowly than electron transfer from QB- to P+; 2) The exchange of quinone between the detergent "phase" and the QB binding site within the same RC micelle is much faster than electron transfer between QA- and P+; 3) The time of the slow component of P+ dark relaxation is determined by (n) > or = 1, the average number of quinones in RC micelles, calculated only for those RC micelles that have at least one quinone per RC (in excess of QA). An analytical function is derived that relates the time of the slow component of P+ relaxation, tau P, and the relative amplitude of the slow phase. This provides a useful means of determining the true equilibrium constant of electron transfer between QA and QB (LAB), and the association equilibrium constant of quinone binding at the QB site (KQ+). We found that LAB = 22 +/- 3 and KQ = 0.6 +/- 0.2 at pH 7.5. The analysis shows that saturation of the QB binding site in detergent-solubilized RCs is difficult to achieve with hydrophobic quinones. This has important implications for the interpretation of apparent dependencies of QB function on environmental parameters (e.g. pH) and on mutational alterations. The model accounts for the effects of detergent and quinone concentration on electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex, and the conclusions are of general significance for the study of quinone-binding membrane proteins in detergent solutions.
在去污剂月桂基二甲基氧化胺(LDAO)存在的情况下,研究了来自紫色光合细菌球形红杆菌反应中心(RCs)光诱导电子转移的动力学。在光诱导电子从初级供体(P)转移到受体醌复合物之后,P+的暗再还原反映了来自还原的受体醌QA-或QB-的重组。次级醌QB松散地结合在RC上,它决定了这个过程的速率。电子转移到QB会减缓电子回到P+的速度,产生恢复动力学的慢相,时间常数τP约为1秒,而缺乏QB的RC中的电荷重组产生快相,时间常数τAP约为0.1秒。通过增加去污剂浓度,可以减少结合在RC胶束上的醌的量。在每个RC胶束中醌含量较低(去污剂浓度较高)时观察到的P+暗弛豫慢成分的特征时间约为1.2 - 1.5秒,这与先前模型的预期形成鲜明对比,根据先前模型,当醌浓度接近零时,慢成分的时间应接近快成分的时间(约0.1秒)。为了解释这种巨大差异,已经开发了一种新的定量方法来分析分离的RC中电子转移的动力学,其具有以下关键特征:1)不同胶束(RC和去污剂胶束)之间醌的交换比从QB-到P+的电子转移慢;2)去污剂“相”与同一RC胶束内QB结合位点之间醌的交换比QA-和P+之间的电子转移快得多;3)P+暗弛豫慢成分的时间由(n)≥1决定,(n)是RC胶束中醌的平均数,仅针对每个RC至少有一个醌(超过QA)的那些RC胶束计算。推导了一个分析函数,该函数将P+弛豫慢成分的时间τP和慢相的相对幅度联系起来。这提供了一种确定QA和QB之间电子转移的真实平衡常数(LAB)以及醌在QB位点结合的缔合平衡常数(KQ+)的有用方法。我们发现在pH 7.5时,LAB = 22±3,KQ = 0.6±0.2。分析表明,用疏水性醌很难使去污剂溶解的RC中的QB结合位点饱和。这对于解释QB功能对环境参数(如pH)和突变改变的表观依赖性具有重要意义。该模型解释了去污剂和醌浓度对受体醌复合物中电子转移的影响,所得结论对于研究去污剂溶液中醌结合膜蛋白具有普遍意义。