Palladino P, Poli P, Masi G, Marcheschi M
Institute of Developmental Neurology, Psychiatry and Educational Psychology, University of Pisa, Italy.
Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Feb;84(1):47-57. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.1.47.
The study investigated the relationship between reflective or impulsive cognitive style, metacognitive functioning, and depression in young adolescents. Metacognitive functioning (metacognitive knowledge about reading and memory, monitoring of text comprehension) and self-reported depressive feelings were analyzed in a group of subjects who showed a Reflective or Impulsive cognitive style. The sample consisted of 56 junior high-school students (Grades 6, 7, and 8) selected from a larger original group of 61 subjects. We excluded from the original group those with an IQ below 75 on both the Verbal and Performance subscales on the short form of the WISC-R, those reported by teachers to have a severe learning disability, and those that did not complete the test battery due to long absences from school. The reflective-impulsive cognitive style was identified with the Matching Familiar Figures Test-20. Using the median of the distribution for both Latency (17 sec. per item) and Errors (9 errors) on this task, the sample was divided in four partially overlapping subgroups: 16 with Impulsive cognitive style (Latency below the median, Errors above the median), 13 with Reflective cognitive style (Latency above the median, Error below the median), 4 fast and accurate (both scores below the median), and 11 slow and inaccurate (both scores above the median). Twelve subjects with one or both scores coinciding with the critical value (median) were excluded. Analysis showed that subjects with Impulsive cognitive style had significantly lower scores than those with Reflective cognitive style in monitoring of comprehension of text. No differences were found on monitoring by eighth graders, irrespective of cognitive style. No differences between the two groups were found in metacognitive knowledge. Subjects with Impulsive cognitive style had significantly higher scores than subjects with Reflective cognitive style on a self-rating scale for childhood depression, the Children's Depression Inventory. The implications of these data are discussed.
该研究调查了青少年的反思性或冲动性认知风格、元认知功能与抑郁之间的关系。对一组表现出反思性或冲动性认知风格的受试者的元认知功能(关于阅读和记忆的元认知知识、对文本理解的监控)和自我报告的抑郁情绪进行了分析。样本由从61名受试者的更大原始群体中选出的56名初中生(六年级、七年级和八年级)组成。我们从原始群体中排除了那些在韦氏儿童智力量表简式的言语和操作分量表上智商均低于75的人、被教师报告有严重学习障碍的人以及因长期缺课而未完成测试组的人。通过匹配熟悉图形测验-20来确定反思-冲动性认知风格。根据该任务中潜伏期(每题17秒)和错误数(9个错误)分布的中位数,样本被分为四个部分重叠的亚组:16名具有冲动性认知风格(潜伏期低于中位数,错误数高于中位数),13名具有反思性认知风格(潜伏期高于中位数,错误数低于中位数),4名快速且准确(两项分数均低于中位数),以及11名缓慢且不准确(两项分数均高于中位数)。排除了12名一项或两项分数与临界值(中位数)相符的受试者。分析表明,在对文本理解的监控方面,具有冲动性认知风格的受试者得分显著低于具有反思性认知风格的受试者。八年级学生在监控方面未发现差异,无论其认知风格如何。在元认知知识方面,两组之间未发现差异。在儿童抑郁自评量表儿童抑郁量表上,具有冲动性认知风格的受试者得分显著高于具有反思性认知风格的受试者。讨论了这些数据的意义。