The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case for.
作者信息
Doyal L
机构信息
St. Bartholomew's and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London.
出版信息
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1114.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case for.
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1114.
2
The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.
3
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.
4
Priority setting in purchasing.
Br J Hosp Med. 1993;49(3):200-2.
5
Rationing health care: from needs to markets? The politics of destruction: rationing in the UK health care market.
Health Care Anal. 1995 Nov;3(4):299-308; discussion 309-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02197076.
6
Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing.
BMJ. 1995 Jun 24;310(6995):1655-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6995.1655.
7
BNHS (British National Health Service) age rationing: a riposte to Bates.
Health Care Anal. 1994 Feb;2(1):39-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02251335.
8
The real ethics of rationing.
BMJ. 1997 Jul 12;315(7100):112-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7100.112.
9
The Oregonian ICU: multitiered monetarized morality in health insurance law.
J Law Med Ethics. 1995 Summer;23(2):149-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01345.x.
10
The rationing debate. Defining a package of healthcare services the NHS is responsible for. The case for.
BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):503-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.498.
引用本文的文献
1
The Relative Importance of Clinical, Economic, Patient Values and Feasibility Criteria in Cancer Drug Reimbursement in Canada: A Revealed Preferences Analysis of Recommendations of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review 2011-2017.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):467-475. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0610-0.
2
The prioritization preferences of pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review members and the Canadian public: a stated-preferences comparison.
Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):322-328. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3033. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
3
The politicization of oncology drug funding reviews in Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):139-43. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3126. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
4
Should the Lambda (λ) Remain Silent?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):323-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0359-7.
5
Personal needs versus national needs: public attitudes regarding health care priorities at the personal and national levels.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015 May 15;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s13584-015-0010-2. eCollection 2015.
6
Bedside rationing by general practitioners: a postal survey in the Danish public healthcare system.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:192. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-192.
7
Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes.
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39563.453183.AD. Epub 2008 May 6.
8
Healthcare rationing in Spain: framework, descriptive analysis and consequences.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(6):537-48. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624060-00002.
9
Ethical principles and the rationing of health care: a qualitative study in general practice.
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Aug;55(517):620-5.
10
Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004 Jan 8;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-2-1.
Zotero 插件