Suppr超能文献

瑞芬太尼与阿芬太尼用于腹部大手术患者的比较。

A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Schüttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, Osnes S, Prys-Roberts C, Holder K, Chauvin M, Viby-Mogensen J, Mogensen T, Gustafson I, Lof L, Noronha D, Kirkham A J

机构信息

Clinic for Anaesthesiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1997 Apr;52(4):307-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.24-az0051.x.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of remifentanil and alfentanil for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were compared. Premedicated patients received a loading dose of remifentanil (1.0 microgram.kg-1; n = 116) and a continuous infusion of 0.5 microgram.kg-1.min-1, or a loading dose of alfentanil (25 micrograms.kg-1; n = 118) and a continuous infusion of 1.0 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Propofol was administered (10 mg every 10 s) until loss of consciousness. Patients' lungs were ventilated with 66% nitrous oxide and 0.5% (end-tidal) isoflurane in oxygen. The study drug infusion rate was reduced by 50% 5 min after intubation. Alfentanil was discontinued 15 min before the end of surgery, whereas remifentanil was continued in the immediate postoperative period at a reduced dose. Responses to intubation (28%) and skin incision (17%) occurred approximately twice as often in the alfentanil group (15% and 8%; p = 0.014 and p = 0.037, respectively). More patients receiving alfentanil had one or more responses to surgery (72% vs. 57%; p = 0.016). The time to spontaneous respiration, adequate respiration, response to verbal command and time to recovery room discharge were similar. However, owing to decreased variability, the time to extubation was shorter with remifentanil than with alfentanil (p = 0.048). There was a similar overall incidence of adverse events in both groups, 82% and 75% of patients, respectively. Adverse events associated with remifentanil were rapidly controlled by dose reductions. The incidence of intra-operative hypotension and bradycardia was higher in the remifentanil group (p < or = 0.033). An initial remifentanil infusion rate of 0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1 titrated to individual need provided postoperative pain relief in the presence of adequate respiration in 71% of patients. When using remifentanil in the immediate postoperative setting, rapid administration of bolus doses and infusion rate increases resulted in a relatively high incidence of muscle rigidity, respiratory depression and apnoea. Changing the postoperative regimen to avoid rapid changes in remifentanil blood concentration resulted in more effective analgesia and dramatically reduced the incidence of adverse events during this period. In patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, remifentanil appears to offer superior intra-operative haemodynamic stability during stressful surgical events compared with alfentanil without compromising recovery from anaesthesia. Remifentanil can be administered as a postoperative analgesic agent at a starting dose of 0.1 microgram-.kg-1.min-1; however, it should only be used in the presence of adequate supervision and monitoring of the patient. Administration of bolus doses is not recommended in this setting.

摘要

比较了瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼用于接受腹部大手术患者的疗效和安全性。接受术前用药的患者接受瑞芬太尼负荷剂量(1.0微克·千克⁻¹;n = 116)并持续输注0.5微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹,或阿芬太尼负荷剂量(25微克·千克⁻¹;n = 118)并持续输注1.0微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹。静脉注射丙泊酚(每10秒10毫克)直至意识消失。患者的肺用66%氧化亚氮和0.5%(呼气末)异氟烷与氧气混合进行通气。插管后5分钟,研究药物输注速率降低50%。阿芬太尼在手术结束前15分钟停用,而瑞芬太尼在术后即刻以降低的剂量继续输注。在阿芬太尼组中,对插管(28%)和皮肤切口(17%)的反应发生率约为瑞芬太尼组(15%和8%)的两倍(分别为p = 0.014和p = 0.037)。更多接受阿芬太尼的患者对手术有一个或多个反应(72%对57%;p = 0.016)。自主呼吸时间、充分呼吸时间、对言语指令的反应时间和恢复室出院时间相似。然而,由于变异性降低,瑞芬太尼组的拔管时间比阿芬太尼组短(p = 0.048)。两组不良事件的总体发生率相似,分别为82%和75%的患者。与瑞芬太尼相关的不良事件通过降低剂量可迅速得到控制。瑞芬太尼组术中低血压和心动过缓的发生率较高(p≤0.033)。初始瑞芬太尼输注速率为0.1微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹并根据个体需要进行滴定,在71%的患者呼吸充分的情况下提供了术后疼痛缓解。在术后即刻使用瑞芬太尼时,快速推注给药和增加输注速率导致肌肉强直、呼吸抑制和呼吸暂停的发生率相对较高。改变术后方案以避免瑞芬太尼血药浓度快速变化可产生更有效的镇痛效果,并显著降低该期间不良事件的发生率。在接受腹部大手术的患者中,与阿芬太尼相比,瑞芬太尼在应激性手术事件期间似乎能提供更好的术中血流动力学稳定性,且不影响麻醉恢复。瑞芬太尼可作为术后镇痛药以0.1微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹的起始剂量给药;然而,仅应在对患者进行充分监督和监测的情况下使用。在此情况下不建议推注给药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验