Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J A, Tollaro I
Department of Orthodontics, University of Florence, Italy.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 May;111(5):502-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70287-7.
A group of 25 untreated subjects with Class II malocclusion in the deciduous dentition (featuring the concomitant presence of distal step, Class II deciduous canine relationship, and excessive overjet) was compared with a control group of 22 untreated subjects with ideal occlusion (flush terminal plane, Class I deciduous canine relationship, minimal overbite, and overjet) at the same dentitional stage. The subjects were monitored during a 2 1/2-year period in the transition from the deciduous to the mixed dentition, during which time no orthodontic treatment was provided. Occlusal analysis of the Class II group in the deciduous dentition revealed an average interarch transverse discrepancy due to a narrow maxillary arch relative to the mandible. All occlusal Class II features were maintained or became exaggerated during the transition to the mixed dentition. The skeletal pattern of Class II malocclusion in the deciduous dentition typically was characterized by significant mandibular skeletal retrusion and mandibular size deficiency. During the period examined, cephalometric changes consisted of significantly greater maxillary growth increments and smaller increments in mandibular dimensions in the Class II sample. Moreover, a greater downward and backward inclination of the condylar axis relative to the mandibular line, with consequent smaller decrements in the gonial angle, were found in the Class II group, an indication of posterior morphogenetic rotation of the mandible in patients with Class II malocclusion occurring during the period examined. The results of this study indicate that the clinical signs of Class II malocclusion are evident in the deciduous dentition and persist into the mixed dentition. Whereas treatment to correct the Class II problem can be initiated in all three planes of space (e.g., RME, extraoral traction, functional jaw orthopedics), other factors such as patient cooperation and management must also be taken into consideration before early treatment is started.
选取一组25名乳牙列期未经治疗的安氏II类错牙合患者(伴有远中台阶、II类乳牙尖牙关系及明显的覆盖过大),与一组22名处于相同牙列期、未经治疗的理想牙合患者(平齐终末平面、I类乳牙尖牙关系、最小覆牙合及覆盖)进行对照。在从乳牙列向混合牙列过渡的2.5年期间对这些受试者进行监测,在此期间未提供正畸治疗。乳牙列期安氏II类组的咬合分析显示,由于上颌牙弓相对于下颌牙弓狭窄,存在平均牙弓间横向差异。在向混合牙列过渡期间,所有安氏II类咬合特征均得以维持或加重。乳牙列期安氏II类错牙合的骨骼模式通常表现为明显的下颌骨骨骼后缩及下颌骨尺寸不足。在所研究的期间,头影测量变化显示,安氏II类样本中上颌骨生长增量明显更大,而下颌骨尺寸增量更小。此外,安氏II类组中髁突轴相对于下颌骨线的向下和向后倾斜度更大,导致下颌角减小幅度更小,这表明在所研究期间,安氏II类错牙合患者的下颌骨发生了后部形态发生旋转。本研究结果表明,安氏II类错牙合的临床体征在乳牙列期即很明显,并持续至混合牙列期。虽然纠正安氏II类问题的治疗可在三维空间(例如,快速扩弓、口外牵引、功能矫治)中开展,但在开始早期治疗之前,还必须考虑患者合作及管理等其他因素。