Becker H C, Diaz-Granados J L, Hale R L
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997 May-Jun;57(1-2):179-83. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00303-6.
Repeated ethanol withdrawal experience has been shown to result in an exacerbation of future withdrawal episodes. This sensitization of the withdrawal response has been hypothesized to represent a "kindling" phenomenon. We previously demonstrated that mice exposed to ethanol vapor for a total of 48 h exhibited more severe withdrawal seizures if the exposure was divided into three 16 h intoxication/8 h abstinence cycles than if the 48 h of exposure occurred in a single bout. The present study was designed to further characterize this model of ethanol withdrawal "kindling" and determine whether such a "kindled" response may be evident when withdrawal testing is conducted after an additional bout of intoxication that is the same for all groups. Adult C3H mice were chronically exposed to ethanol vapor in inhalation chambers for 40 h prior to withdrawal testing. Prior to this 40 h intoxication period, one group (Multiple Withdrawal; MW) received three cycles of 16 h ethanol vapor separated by 8 h abstinence; a second group (Single Withdrawal; SW) did not receive any ethanol exposure prior to the 40 h test cycle; a third group (Continuous Exposure; CE) received the same total ethanol exposure as the MW group (48 hr), but without interruption: and a control group (C) did not receive any ethanol treatment throughout the experiment. Blood ethanol levels following the 40 h bout of ethanol intoxication were 100-140 mg/dl for all ethanol-exposed groups. The severity of handling-induced convulsions during withdrawal was significantly greater in the MW group compared to CE and SW groups. These results suggest that differences in the severity of ethanol withdrawal seizures due to differences in prior withdrawal experience can be demonstrated even when later ethanol exposure patterns are equated. As such, the results provide further support for the "kindling" hypothesis of ethanol withdrawal.
反复的乙醇戒断经历已被证明会导致未来戒断发作的加剧。这种戒断反应的敏化被假设为代表一种“点燃”现象。我们之前证明,暴露于乙醇蒸汽中总共48小时的小鼠,如果暴露被分为三个16小时中毒/8小时戒断周期,比48小时暴露在一次发作中表现出更严重的戒断惊厥。本研究旨在进一步表征这种乙醇戒断“点燃”模型,并确定当对所有组进行相同的额外中毒发作后进行戒断测试时,这种“点燃”反应是否明显。成年C3H小鼠在戒断测试前在吸入室中慢性暴露于乙醇蒸汽40小时。在这40小时中毒期之前,一组(多次戒断;MW)接受三个16小时乙醇蒸汽周期,间隔8小时戒断;第二组(单次戒断;SW)在40小时测试周期之前未接受任何乙醇暴露;第三组(持续暴露;CE)接受与MW组相同的总乙醇暴露量(48小时),但无中断;对照组(C)在整个实验中未接受任何乙醇处理。所有乙醇暴露组在40小时乙醇中毒发作后的血液乙醇水平为100 - 140mg/dl。与CE组和SW组相比,MW组在戒断期间处理诱导的惊厥严重程度明显更高。这些结果表明,即使后期乙醇暴露模式相同,由于先前戒断经历的差异导致的乙醇戒断惊厥严重程度的差异也可以得到证明。因此,这些结果为乙醇戒断的“点燃”假说提供了进一步的支持。