Stiell I G, Wells G A, Vandemheen K, Laupacis A, Brison R, Eisenhauer M A, Greenberg G H, MacPhail I, McKnight R D, Reardon M, Verbeek R, Worthington J, Lesiuk H
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ont.
CMAJ. 1997 Jun 1;156(11):1537-44.
To, assess the emergency department use of cervical spine radiography for alert, stable adult trauma patients in terms of utilization, yield for injury and variation in practices among hospitals and physicians.
Retrospective survey of health records.
Emergency departments of 6 teaching and 2 community hospitals in Ontario and British Columbia.
Consecutive alert, stable adult trauma patients seen with potential cervical spine injury between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1995.
Total number of eligible patients, referral for cervical spine radiography (overall, by hospital and by physician), presence of cervical spine injury, patient characteristics and hospitals associated with use of radiography.
Of 6855 eligible patients, cervical spine radiography was ordered for 3979 (58.0%). Only 60 (0.9%) patients were found to have an acute cervical spine injury (fracture, dislocation or ligamentous instability); 98.5% of the radiographic films were negative for any significant abnormality. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were similar across the 8 hospitals, and no cervical spine injuries were missed. Significant variation was found among the 8 hospitals in the rate of ordering radiography (p < 0.0001), from a low of 37.0% to a high of 72.5%. After possible differences in case severity and patient characteristics at each hospital were controlled for, logistic regression analysis revealed that 6 of the hospitals were significantly associated with the use of radiography. At 7 hospitals, there was significant variation in the rate of ordering radiography among the attending emergency physicians (p < 0.05), from a low of 15.6% to a high of 91.5%.
Despite considerable variation among institutions and individual physicians in the ordering of cervical spine radiography for alert, stable trauma patients with similar characteristics, no cervical spine injuries were missed. The number of radiographic films showing signs of abnormality was extremely low at all hospitals. The findings suggest that cervical spine radiography could be used more efficiently, possibly with the help of a clinical decision rule.
评估急诊科对警觉、稳定的成年创伤患者进行颈椎X线检查的使用情况,包括利用率、损伤检出率以及医院和医生之间的操作差异。
对健康记录进行回顾性调查。
安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的6家教学医院和2家社区医院的急诊科。
1994年7月1日至1995年6月30日期间连续就诊的、有潜在颈椎损伤的警觉、稳定的成年创伤患者。
符合条件的患者总数、颈椎X线检查的转诊情况(总体、按医院和按医生)、颈椎损伤的存在情况、患者特征以及与X线检查使用相关的医院。
在6855名符合条件的患者中,3979名(58.0%)患者接受了颈椎X线检查。仅60名(0.9%)患者被发现有急性颈椎损伤(骨折、脱位或韧带不稳定);98.5%的X线片未显示任何明显异常。8家医院患者的人口统计学和临床特征相似,且无一例颈椎损伤被漏诊。8家医院在X线检查开具率方面存在显著差异(p<0.0001),从低至37.0%到高至72.5%。在控制了各医院病例严重程度和患者特征的可能差异后,逻辑回归分析显示,其中6家医院与X线检查的使用显著相关。在7家医院,急诊主治医生之间的X线检查开具率存在显著差异(p<0.05),从低至15.6%到高至91.5%。
尽管在为具有相似特征的警觉、稳定创伤患者开具颈椎X线检查方面,机构和个体医生之间存在相当大的差异,但无一例颈椎损伤被漏诊。所有医院显示异常迹象的X线片数量极低。研究结果表明,可能借助临床决策规则,颈椎X线检查可以更有效地使用。