Suppr超能文献

天然和合成I型干扰素的生物学活性。

Biologic activities of natural and synthetic type I interferons.

作者信息

Pfeffer L M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis 38163, USA.

出版信息

Semin Oncol. 1997 Jun;24(3 Suppl 9):S9-63-S9-69.

PMID:9208874
Abstract

Because alpha-interferon (IFN-alpha) has a number of therapeutic applications in the treatment of various human cancers and diseases of viral origin, an understanding of how this family of proteins interacts with cells to induce their pleiotropic biologic activities is essential. Available data suggest that recombinant IFN-alphas from both natural and synthetic genes bind to a common cell surface receptor and induce antiviral activity in a variety of cell lines. IFN-alphas were found to differ significantly in their abilities to bind to cells; this difference varied with the types of IFN-alpha and cell type used. Consensus interferon (IFN-con1), a nonnaturally occurring synthetic IFN, and IFN-alpha2b competed about equally well for receptor binding sites on Daudi and CaKi cells and were followed by IFN-alpha8 in the ability to compete. Results of affinity cross-linking experiments indicated that all three IFN-alphas interacted similarly with the multichain IFN-alpha receptor. IFN-alpha7, however, competed poorly for binding sites on both cell lines. Each of the IFN-alphas tested displayed discrete biologic differences, which also varied with the assay system used. IFN-con1 and IFN-alpha2b displayed similar antiviral activities on CaKi cells using vesicular stomatitis virus; the viral activities of these IFNs were significantly greater than those of IFN-alpha7 or IFN-alpha8. Studies with murine transfectants demonstrated significant differences in the various IFNs to interact with the IFN-alpha receptor-1 chain of the type I IFN receptor. It is yet to be established, however, that these various in vitro distinctions result in differences in clinical benefit or toxicity between the various subtypes.

摘要

由于α干扰素(IFN-α)在治疗多种人类癌症和病毒源性疾病方面有许多治疗应用,因此了解这类蛋白质如何与细胞相互作用以诱导其多效性生物学活性至关重要。现有数据表明,天然基因和合成基因的重组IFN-α都与共同的细胞表面受体结合,并在多种细胞系中诱导抗病毒活性。发现IFN-α与细胞结合的能力存在显著差异;这种差异因IFN-α的类型和所用细胞类型而异。共识干扰素(IFN-con1),一种非天然存在的合成IFN,和IFN-α2b在与Daudi细胞和CaKi细胞上的受体结合位点竞争方面表现相当,其次是IFN-α8的竞争能力。亲和交联实验结果表明,所有三种IFN-α与多链IFN-α受体的相互作用相似。然而,IFN-α7在两种细胞系上与结合位点的竞争能力较差。所测试的每种IFN-α都表现出明显的生物学差异,这也因所用的检测系统而异。使用水疱性口炎病毒时,IFN-con1和IFN-α2b在CaKi细胞上表现出相似的抗病毒活性;这些IFN的病毒活性明显高于IFN-α7或IFN-α8。对小鼠转染细胞的研究表明,各种IFN与I型IFN受体的IFN-α受体-1链相互作用存在显著差异。然而,这些体外的各种差异是否会导致不同亚型在临床益处或毒性方面存在差异,仍有待确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验