Smári J, Arason E, Hafsteinsson H, Ingimarsson S
Faculty of Social Science, National University Hospitals, University of Iceland.
Scand J Psychol. 1997 Jun;38(2):151-6. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00021.
This study addressed the role of coping style in anxiety and depression of unemployed people. Two-hundred thirty-three people checking in at unemployment services participated. They filled in Carver, Scheier and Weintraub's (1989) coping measure (COPE), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD), gave information as to age, duration of unemployment and their appraisal of their situation. Four secondary dimensions of COPE were used in data analyses. Multiple regression analyses were undertaken with anxiety/depression as dependent and the coping variables as independent variables, with background/appraisal variables entered first. Coping variables added to the prediction of anxiety and depression over and above background/appraisal variables. For women Focus on Emotion as well as Avoidance was related to higher anxiety/depression scores (p < 0.01), whereas Reappraisal was related to lower anxiety/depression (p < 0.05). For men only Avoidance was related to anxiety/depression (p < 0.01). More Avoidance co-occurred with higher levels of anxiety as well as depression. The results are discussed with respect to possible intervention.
本研究探讨了应对方式在失业人群焦虑和抑郁中的作用。233名前往失业服务机构登记的人员参与了研究。他们填写了卡弗、谢尔和温特劳布(1989年)的应对方式量表(COPE)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD),并提供了年龄、失业时长以及对自身状况的评估信息。数据分析中使用了COPE量表的四个次级维度。以焦虑/抑郁为因变量、应对变量为自变量进行多元回归分析,首先纳入背景/评估变量。应对变量在背景/评估变量之外,增加了对焦虑和抑郁的预测能力。对于女性而言,关注情绪以及回避与更高的焦虑/抑郁得分相关(p < 0.01),而重新评价则与更低的焦虑/抑郁相关(p < 0.05)。对于男性,只有回避与焦虑/抑郁相关(p < 0.01)。更多的回避与更高水平的焦虑和抑郁同时出现。针对可能的干预措施对研究结果进行了讨论。