Suppr超能文献

放射性闭塞性动脉疾病的管理:重新评估

Management of radiation-induced occlusive arterial disease: a reassessment.

作者信息

Mellière D, Becquemin J P, Berrahal D, Desgranges P, Cavillon A

机构信息

Val-de-Marne University, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1997 Jun;38(3):261-9.

PMID:9219476
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to evaluate the operative hazards, therapeutic procedures, and late results of arterial reconstruction for radiation-induced occlusive disease.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients were referred to our institution for radiation-induced occlusive arterial disease. Group 1: carotid artery stenosis or occlusion was encountered in seven patients. The nine procedures employed included percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (n = 2), carotid endarterectomy (n = 3), vein or prosthetic bypass (n = 4). Group 2: four patients presenting with subclavian and axillary artery occlusion were treated with a common carotid to brachial artery vein bypass, one after unsuccessful PTA. Group 3: Thirteen patients had aorto-iliac occlusion. Initial management included medical treatment (n = 1), PTA (n = 2), aorto-bifemoral bypass (n = 4), aortofemoral and iliofemoral bypass (n = 1 each), axillofemoral bypass (n = 3), femorofemoral bypass (n = 1). Group 4: One patient had femoral artery occlusion treated with PTA.

RESULTS

Group 1: One of two PTA was successful. Endarterectomy or bypass were successful in all cases. One late vein bypass stenosis was treated by venous patch angioplasty. Group 2: All vein bypasses were successful. Group 3: Limb salvage was achieved in all patients but eight required repeat operations for prosthetic sepsis (n = 3), restenosis (n = 3), or thrombosis (n = 12). Two patients died of late sepsis. Group 4: Outcome after PTA was successful.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Surgery for radiation-induced arterial lesions is difficult because of arterial, periarterial, and cutaneous sclerosis. Some patients, however, are amenable to PTA or endarterectomy. When bypass is necessary, anastomosis should be performed in healthy arteries, for instance, the thoracic aorta for the proximal anastomosis, or the brachial artery approached through a lateral mid-arm incision. 2) The risk of early or late graft infection is enhanced by the presence of tracheostomy, colostomy, or ureterostomy and by repeat operation for thrombosis. PTA, endarterectomy, or vein bypass should be preferred whenever feasible. When prosthetic material is unavoidable, prevention of infection should include the use of omentoplasty, remote bypass, antibiotic-bonded grafts or, in the case of major sepsis, allografts. 3) As restenosis remains a frequent complication, annual clinical and Duplex-scan surveillance is mandatory.
摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估放射性闭塞性疾病动脉重建的手术风险、治疗方法及远期疗效。

方法

25例放射性闭塞性动脉疾病患者转诊至我院。第1组:7例患者存在颈动脉狭窄或闭塞。采用的9种手术包括经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)(2例)、颈动脉内膜切除术(3例)、静脉或人工血管搭桥术(4例)。第2组:4例锁骨下动脉和腋动脉闭塞患者接受了颈总动脉至肱动脉的静脉搭桥术,其中1例PTA失败后进行该手术。第3组:13例患者存在腹主动脉-髂动脉闭塞。初始治疗包括药物治疗(1例)、PTA(2例)、腹主动脉-双股动脉搭桥术(4例)、腹主动脉-股动脉和髂动脉-股动脉搭桥术(各1例)、腋动脉-股动脉搭桥术(3例)、股动脉-股动脉搭桥术(1例)。第4组:1例股动脉闭塞患者接受了PTA治疗。

结果

第1组:2例PTA中有1例成功。内膜切除术或搭桥术均成功。1例静脉搭桥术后晚期狭窄经静脉补片血管成形术治疗。第2组:所有静脉搭桥术均成功。第3组:所有患者均成功保肢,但8例因人工血管感染(3例)、再狭窄(3例)或血栓形成(12例)需要再次手术。2例患者死于晚期感染。第4组:PTA治疗成功。

结论

1)由于动脉、动脉周围及皮肤硬化,放射性动脉病变的手术难度较大。然而,部分患者适合PTA或内膜切除术。必要时进行搭桥手术时,应在健康动脉进行吻合,例如近端吻合于胸主动脉,或通过上臂外侧中部切口显露肱动脉进行吻合。2)气管造口术、结肠造口术或输尿管造口术的存在以及因血栓形成进行再次手术会增加早期或晚期移植物感染的风险。只要可行,应首选PTA、内膜切除术或静脉搭桥术。不可避免使用人工血管材料时,预防感染应包括使用网膜成形术、远位搭桥术、抗生素涂层移植物,或在严重感染时使用同种异体移植物。3)由于再狭窄仍是常见并发症,每年进行临床及双功超声监测是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验