Neumeister W, Rasche K, Schultze-Werninghaus G
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannsheil-Universitätsklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Med Klin (Munich). 1997 Apr 28;92 Suppl 1:18-21.
The measurement of mouth occlusion pressure is an easy method to assess respiratory drive and muscle function. In addition to a variety of stationary systems, recently a mobile computer assisted system became available. In this study the repeatability of inspiratory mouth occlusion pressures with such a mobile system was examined.
Maximal inspiratory mouth occlusion pressure (PImax), mouth occlusion pressure 100 ms after onset of normal inspiration (P0,1), and PImax after 100 ms (P0,1max) were investigated 4 times in 12 healthy subjects. Measurements were performed with a mobile system (resPImax). Criteria of repeatability were analysis of variance, intraindividual standard deviation, variation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient.
Of all analyzed parameters PImax was most reproducible with a 5.3% share of variance due to measurement methods of the total variance. P0,1 was least reproducible. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of each day. The variance due to measurement methods varied between 5.3% and 30%.
The repeatability of mouth occlusion pressures with this mobile device was good and partly superior to stationary systems. The concept of a mobile measuring unit simplifies getting results of bed-bound and mechanically ventilated patients.
测量口腔阻断压是评估呼吸驱动力和肌肉功能的一种简便方法。除了各种固定系统外,最近出现了一种移动计算机辅助系统。在本研究中,对这种移动系统测量吸气口腔阻断压的可重复性进行了检查。
对12名健康受试者进行了4次最大吸气口腔阻断压(PImax)、正常吸气开始100毫秒后的口腔阻断压(P0,1)以及100毫秒后的PImax(P0,1max)的测量。使用移动系统(resPImax)进行测量。可重复性标准包括方差分析、个体内标准差、变异系数和组内相关系数。
在所有分析参数中,PImax的可重复性最高,测量方法导致的方差占总方差的5.3%。P0,1的可重复性最低。每天的测量结果之间无统计学显著差异。测量方法导致的方差在5.3%至30%之间变化。
这种移动设备测量口腔阻断压的可重复性良好,部分优于固定系统。移动测量单元的概念简化了卧床和机械通气患者的测量结果获取。