Shadick N A, Daltroy L H, Phillips C B, Liang U S, Liang M H
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;13(4):265-70.
Tick bite control is an important initiative to prevent Lyme disease and other tickborne infections. While several studies have demonstrated that knowledge and awareness of Lyme disease in endemic areas are good, none has evaluated the relative importance of knowledge with other attitudinal and health belief variables to determine motivators of preventive behavior.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 304 commuter ferry passengers departing Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachusetts, in August 1992, to ascertain the prevalence of tick-avoidance behaviors among individuals from an endemic area of Lyme disease and to identify the knowledge, behavioral, and demographic variables that best determine precautionary behavior.
Overall, survey respondents (n = 304) had very good knowledge of Lyme disease (73% items correct on a knowledge test), but only 59% of respondents reported limiting time in tick areas, 58% usually wore protective clothing, 40% wore tick repellent, and 66% usually performed tick checks. By stepwise linear regression analysis, determinants of tick-avoidance behaviors included perceiving the behavior's benefits as outweighing its inconvenience (P < .0001), having confidence in recognizing Lyme disease symptoms (P < .0004), believing that Lyme disease is a serious illness (P < .0009), and believing that the avoidance behavior is effective in reducing the risk of Lyme disease (P < .01). Younger respondents (P < .05) performed fewer avoidance behaviors. Visitors (P < .0001) performed fewer tick checks than residents. Having confidence that one could find a tick on oneself with a tick check also predicted performance (P < .008). Increased general knowledge about Lyme disease did not predict any protective behaviors.
Precautionary behaviors were underperformed in an at-risk population despite good knowledge of Lyme disease symptoms and transmission. Instead, performance was related to confidence in finding a tick on oneself and a perception that a precaution's benefit outweighed its inconvenience and would adequately reduce risk for Lyme disease. These data have implications for Lyme disease prevention programs, which typically focus on enhancing general knowledge as a means toward disease reduction.
蜱虫叮咬防控是预防莱姆病和其他蜱传感染的一项重要举措。虽然多项研究表明,流行地区居民对莱姆病的了解和认知情况良好,但尚无研究评估知识与其他态度及健康信念变量对预防行为动机的相对重要性。
1992年8月,我们对304名从马萨诸塞州玛莎葡萄园岛出发的通勤渡轮乘客进行了横断面分析,以确定莱姆病流行地区居民中蜱虫规避行为的流行情况,并确定最能决定预防行为的知识、行为和人口统计学变量。
总体而言,调查对象(n = 304)对莱姆病有很好的了解(知识测试中73%的题目回答正确),但只有59%的受访者表示会限制在蜱虫出没区域的时间,58%的人通常会穿防护服,40%的人会使用驱虫剂,66%的人通常会进行蜱虫检查。通过逐步线性回归分析,蜱虫规避行为的决定因素包括认为该行为的益处大于不便之处(P < .0001)、对识别莱姆病症状有信心(P < .0004)、认为莱姆病是一种严重疾病(P < .0009)以及认为规避行为能有效降低感染莱姆病的风险(P < .01)。年轻受访者的规避行为较少(P < .05)。游客进行蜱虫检查的次数少于居民(P < .0001)。相信自己能通过蜱虫检查发现身上有蜱虫也能预测行为表现(P < .008)。对莱姆病的一般知识增加并不能预测任何保护行为。
尽管对莱姆病症状和传播有很好的了解,但高危人群的预防行为执行情况不佳。相反,行为表现与相信自己能发现身上有蜱虫以及认为预防措施的益处大于不便之处且能充分降低感染莱姆病的风险有关。这些数据对莱姆病预防项目具有启示意义,这些项目通常将重点放在增强一般知识以减少疾病传播上。