Sheldon M R, Fillyaw M J, Thompson W D
University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, USA.
Physiother Res Int. 1996;1(4):221-8. doi: 10.1002/pri.66.
The purpose of this paper is to review the use and interpretation of the Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks test for ordinal-level data in repeated measurement designs. Physical therapists frequently make three or more repeated measurements of the same individual to compare different treatments, or to assess the effect of a single treatment over time. When the measurements are ordinal-scaled, such as some ratings of functional status and muscle strength, statistical significance may be determined by the Friedman test. We illustrate the use of the Friedman test and a post hoc multiple comparison test with data from 27 subjects whose performance on a lifting task was rated on three occasions by use of an ordinal scale. We discuss the interpretation of ordinal-level data and recommend that therapists understand the limitations a measurement scale imposes on the inferences that can be made from these tests.
本文旨在回顾弗里德曼双向秩次方差分析在重复测量设计中对有序水平数据的使用和解释。物理治疗师经常对同一个体进行三次或更多次重复测量,以比较不同治疗方法,或评估单一治疗方法随时间的效果。当测量采用有序尺度时,如某些功能状态和肌肉力量的评级,可通过弗里德曼检验确定统计学显著性。我们用来自27名受试者的数据举例说明弗里德曼检验和事后多重比较检验的使用,这些受试者在一项举重任务中的表现通过有序尺度分三次进行评级。我们讨论了有序水平数据的解释,并建议治疗师了解测量尺度对从这些检验中得出的推论所施加的局限性。