Suppr超能文献

甲状腺及甲状旁腺手术后的恶心与呕吐

Nausea and vomiting following thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

作者信息

Sonner J M, Hynson J M, Clark O, Katz J A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine 94115, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1997 Aug;9(5):398-402. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00069-x.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following thyroid and parathyroid surgery. To determine whether PONV is reduced when propofol is used for maintenance of anesthesia as compared to isoflurane and to evaluate the costs and resource consumption associated with these two anesthetic regimens.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital--a referral center for endocrinologic surgery.

PATIENTS

118 ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18 years and older, undergoing elective thyroid or parathyroid surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either isoflurane (0.5 to 1.3% end-tidal) or propofol (50 to 200 micrograms/kg/min) for maintenance of anesthesia. All patients received propofol for induction of anesthesia, succinylcholine or vecuronium, nitrous oxide, and fentanyl. Prophylactic antiemetics were not administered. Postoperative pain was treated with ketorolac, fentanyl, or acetaminophen.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Signs and symptoms of nausea and vomiting were graded on a four point scale as 1 = no nausea; 2 = mild nausea; 3 = severe nausea; 4 = retching and/or vomiting. Grades 3 and 4 were grouped together as PONV. The combined incidence of PONV was 54% over the 24-hour postoperative evaluation period. PONV was significantly more common in patients receiving isoflurane than propofol for maintenance of anesthesia (64% vs. 44%). In women (n = 87), the incidence of PONV was significantly greater in those patients who received isoflurane than those who received propofol for maintenance (71% vs. 42%). However, in men (n = 31), there was no significant difference in PONV between anesthetic regimens (47% with isoflurane vs. 50% with propofol). There were no differences in the duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, time to discharge from the hospital, or local wound complications (hematomas) between groups. The use of propofol for maintenance of anesthesia was associated with an additional cost, relative to the isoflurane group, of $54.26 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery are at high risk for the development of PONV. Propofol for maintenance of anesthesia, although more expensive than isoflurane, reduces the rate of PONV in women.

摘要

研究目的

确定甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率。确定与异氟烷相比,使用丙泊酚维持麻醉时PONV是否减少,并评估这两种麻醉方案的成本和资源消耗。

设计

随机前瞻性研究。

地点

大学附属医院——内分泌外科转诊中心。

患者

118例年龄18岁及以上、ASA身体状况为I级和II级、接受择期甲状腺或甲状旁腺手术的患者。

干预措施

患者接受异氟烷(呼气末浓度0.5%至1.3%)或丙泊酚(50至200微克/千克/分钟)维持麻醉。所有患者均接受丙泊酚诱导麻醉、琥珀酰胆碱或维库溴铵、氧化亚氮和芬太尼。未使用预防性止吐药。术后疼痛用酮咯酸、芬太尼或对乙酰氨基酚治疗。

测量指标及主要结果

恶心呕吐的体征和症状按四点量表分级,1 = 无恶心;2 = 轻度恶心;3 = 重度恶心;4 = 干呕和/或呕吐。3级和4级归为PONV。在术后24小时评估期内,PONV的综合发生率为54%。接受异氟烷维持麻醉的患者PONV明显比接受丙泊酚的患者更常见(64%对44%)。在女性(n = 87)中,接受异氟烷维持麻醉的患者PONV发生率明显高于接受丙泊酚的患者(71%对42%)。然而,在男性(n = 31)中,不同麻醉方案的PONV发生率无显著差异(异氟烷组为47%,丙泊酚组为50%)。两组在麻醉后护理单元的停留时间、出院时间或局部伤口并发症(血肿)方面无差异。相对于异氟烷组,使用丙泊酚维持麻醉每位患者额外花费54.26美元。

结论

接受甲状腺或甲状旁腺手术的患者发生PONV的风险很高。丙泊酚维持麻醉虽然比异氟烷贵,但可降低女性的PONV发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验