Yeomans M R, Gray R W, Mitchell C J, True S
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, U.K.
Appetite. 1997 Aug;29(1):61-76. doi: 10.1006/appe.1997.0092.
The effects of the introduction of timed pauses within meals and palatability on food intake and changes in rated appetite during a meal were assessed in three experiments in which volunteers ate a lunch of pasta with a tomato sauce. Eating was monitored using a disguised electronic balance attached to a micro-computer, which also allowed the introduction of timed pauses within meals. In the first experiment, 16 subjects were tested with both a bland and palatable food (with 0.27% oregano), with eating uninterrupted or with pauses after every 50 g consumed during which appetite ratings were completed. Both the addition of oregano and the introduction of regular within-meal pauses enhanced overall intake. Rated hunger increased in the early stages of eating the palatable food in the interrupted condition, and then declined, whereas hunger declined throughout with the bland food. Similarly, the linear function relating intake to time in the uninterrupted condition was greater with the palatable food. In the second experiment, nine subjects ate the palatable food with no pauses within meals, with 30-second pauses with appetite ratings or with 30-second pauses in a non-appetite task. Intake was greater in both pause conditions than when eating was uninterrupted. In Experiment 3, the effect of pause duration was investigated in a further 16 subjects, with either no pause or a pause of 5, 30 or 60 seconds. Subjects ate more in all pause conditions than with no pauses, while ratings of hunger and fullness suggested that subjects were less satisfied at the end of the meal with longer pauses. These data confirm previous work which suggests that palatability exerts its effect by stimulating appetite and eating rate, but also suggest that the introduction of pauses within meals enhances intake as well, contradicting the idea that pausing within meals should reduce intake by allowing more time for post-ingestive satiety to develop.
在三项实验中,研究人员让志愿者食用配有番茄酱的意大利面午餐,以此评估用餐时引入定时停顿以及食物美味程度对食物摄入量和用餐期间食欲评分变化的影响。实验通过连接微型计算机的伪装电子秤来监测进食情况,该电子秤还能在进餐过程中引入定时停顿。在第一个实验中,16名受试者分别食用口味清淡和美味的食物(添加0.27%牛至叶),进食过程要么不间断,要么每摄入50克后停顿一下,同时完成食欲评分。添加牛至叶和在进餐过程中定期停顿都增加了总体摄入量。在间断进食美味食物的情况下,进食初期饥饿评分增加,随后下降,而食用清淡食物时饥饿感则持续下降。同样,在不间断进食的情况下,美味食物摄入量与时间的线性函数更大。在第二个实验中,9名受试者食用美味食物,进餐过程中要么不停顿,要么停顿30秒并进行食欲评分,要么停顿30秒但进行非食欲相关任务。两种停顿情况下的摄入量均高于不间断进食时。在实验3中,另外16名受试者参与研究,调查停顿持续时间的影响,停顿时间分别为无停顿、5秒、30秒或60秒。所有停顿情况下受试者的进食量均多于无停顿情况,而饥饿和饱腹感评分表明,停顿时间越长,受试者在餐后的满意度越低。这些数据证实了之前的研究结果,即美味通过刺激食欲和进食速度发挥作用,但也表明在进餐过程中引入停顿同样会增加摄入量,这与进餐时停顿会因有更多时间让消化后的饱腹感产生而减少摄入量的观点相矛盾。