Vorperian V R, Havighurst T C, Miller S, January C T
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Sep;30(3):791-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00220-9.
We sought to assess the odds of experiencing adverse effects with low dose amiodarone therapy compared with placebo.
An estimate of the likelihood of experiencing amiodarone-related adverse effects with exposure to low daily doses of the drug is lacking in the published reports, and little information is available on adverse effect event rates in control groups not receiving the drug.
Data from four published trials involving 1,465 patients were included in a meta-analysis design. The criteria for inclusion were 1) double-blind, placebo-controlled design; 2) absence of a crossover design between patient groups; 3) mean follow-up of at least 12 months; 4) maintenance amiodarone dose < or = 400 mg/day; and 5) presence of an explicit description of adverse effects. Data were pooled after testing for homogeneity of treatment effects across trials, and summary odds ratios were calculated by the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method for each adverse effect.
The mean amiodarone dose per day ranged from 152 to 330 mg; 738 patients were randomized to receive amiodarone and 727 placebo. Exposure to amiodarone in this dose range, for a minimal duration of 12 months, resulted in odds similar to those of placebo for hepatic and gastrointestinal adverse effects, but in significantly higher odds than those of placebo (p < 0.05) for experiencing thyroid (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 8.7), neurologic (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7), skin (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.2), ocular (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 9.6) and bradycardic (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.3) adverse effects. A trend toward increased odds of pulmonary toxicity was noted (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 5.3), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). The unadjusted total incidence of drug discontinuation was 22.9% in the amiodarone group and 15.4% in the placebo group. The odds of discontinuing the drug in the amiodarone group was approximately 1.5 times that of the placebo group (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9) (p = 0.003).
Compared with placebo, there is a higher likelihood of experiencing several amiodarone-related adverse effects with exposure to low daily doses of the drug. Thus, although low dose amiodarone may be well tolerated, it is not free of adverse effects.
我们试图评估与安慰剂相比,低剂量胺碘酮治疗出现不良反应的几率。
已发表的报告中缺乏关于每日低剂量接触胺碘酮时出现与胺碘酮相关不良反应可能性的估计,且关于未接受该药物的对照组中不良反应事件发生率的信息很少。
四项涉及1465名患者的已发表试验的数据被纳入荟萃分析设计。纳入标准为:1)双盲、安慰剂对照设计;2)患者组之间无交叉设计;3)平均随访至少12个月;4)胺碘酮维持剂量≤400毫克/天;5)对不良反应有明确描述。在对各试验的治疗效果进行同质性检验后汇总数据,并通过Peto修正的Mantel-Haenszel方法计算每种不良反应的汇总比值比。
每日胺碘酮平均剂量为152至330毫克;738名患者被随机分配接受胺碘酮治疗,727名接受安慰剂治疗。在此剂量范围内接触胺碘酮至少12个月,导致肝脏和胃肠道不良反应的几率与安慰剂相似,但出现甲状腺(比值比[OR]4.2,95%置信区间[CI]2.0至8.7)、神经(OR 2.0,95%CI 1.1至3.7)、皮肤(OR 2.5,95%CI 1.1至6.2)、眼部(OR 3.4,95%CI 1.2至9.6)和心动过缓(OR 2.2,95%CI 1.1至4.3)不良反应的几率显著高于安慰剂(p<0.05)。观察到肺毒性几率有增加趋势(OR 2.0,95%CI 0.9至5.3),但未达到统计学显著性(p = 0.07)。胺碘酮组药物停用的未调整总发生率为22.9%,安慰剂组为15.4%。胺碘酮组停用药物的几率约为安慰剂组的1.5倍(OR 1.52,95%CI 1.2至1.9)(p = 0.003)。
与安慰剂相比,每日低剂量接触胺碘酮时出现几种与胺碘酮相关不良反应的可能性更高。因此,尽管低剂量胺碘酮可能耐受性良好,但并非没有不良反应。