Brandi L S, Bertolini R, Pieri M, Giunta F, Calafà M
Department of Surgery, School of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Aug;23(8):908-15. doi: 10.1007/s001340050431.
To calculate cardiac ouptut from dual oximetry with carbon dioxide production (VCO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) measured by a new metabolic monitor, and to compare these values with measurements made simultaneously using the thermodilution method during the steady state condition.
Prospective, comparative clinical study.
The adult postsurgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a University Hospital.
Twenty mechanically ventilated postsurgical patients (70.7 +/- 7.8 years of age; range 50-84).
A new metabolic monitor (Puritan-Bennett 7250, Carlsbard, USA) connected to a ventilator (Puritan-Bennett 7200) was used to measure VCO2 and VO2. Measurements of arterial (SaO2) and mixed venous (SvO2) oxygen saturations were made using pulse and venous fiberoptic oximeters. Cardiac output starting from VCO2 (COVCO2) was obtained according to Mahutte's formula: COVCO2 = VCO2/[k (SaO2-SvO2)], where k represents a constant. The value for each patient was determined from the initial measurements of thermodilution cardiac output (COtd), VCO2, SaO2 and SvO2. COVCO2 calculated from the previous equation was compared to the COtd. Cardiac output calculated from the traditional O2 Fick equation (COVO2) was compared to the COtd. All patients were studied over a period of 120 min at 15-min intervals in reasonably stable conditions. COVCO2 was closely related to COtd (r = 0.94; SEE = 0.79; p = 0.0001; n = 180) with a bias of -0.10 and a precision of 0.45 l/min. The mean percent difference between the two methods was -2.2 +/- 8.3%. COVO2 was related to COtd (r = 0.77; SEE = 0.79; p = 0.0001; n = 180) with a bias of -0.57 and precision of 0.86 l/min. The mean percent difference between the two methods was -10.8 +/- 16.0%.
In stable patients, cardiac output measurements obtained from dual oximetry with VO2 and VCO2 measured by this new metabolic monitor, show good correlation with measurements made using the thermodilution method. The values of cardiac output calculated from VCO2 are more accurate and precise than values from VO2. The validity of these measurements in hemodynamically unstable patients and during various modes of mechanical ventilation seems warranted.
通过一种新型代谢监测仪测量的二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)和氧气消耗量(VO2),利用双血氧饱和度法计算心输出量,并将这些值与稳态条件下同时使用热稀释法测量的值进行比较。
前瞻性、对比性临床研究。
一所大学医院的成人术后重症监护病房(ICU)。
20例接受机械通气的术后患者(年龄70.7±7.8岁;范围50 - 84岁)。
使用连接到呼吸机(Puritan - Bennett 7200)的新型代谢监测仪(美国卡尔斯巴德的Puritan - Bennett 7250)测量VCO2和VO2。使用脉搏和静脉光纤血氧饱和度仪测量动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)和混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)。根据马胡特公式从VCO2计算心输出量(COVCO2):COVCO2 = VCO2 / [k(SaO2 - SvO2)],其中k为常数。每个患者的值由热稀释心输出量(COtd)、VCO2、SaO2和SvO2的初始测量值确定。将根据上述公式计算的COVCO2与COtd进行比较。将根据传统氧耗量菲克方程计算的心输出量(COVO2)与COtd进行比较。在相当稳定的条件下,对所有患者进行了为期120分钟、间隔15分钟的研究。COVCO2与COtd密切相关(r = 0.94;标准误 = 0.79;p = 0.0001;n = 180),偏差为 - 0.10,精密度为0.45升/分钟。两种方法之间的平均百分比差异为 - 2.2±8.3%。COVO2与COtd相关(r = 0.77;标准误 = 0.79;p = 0.0001;n = 180),偏差为 - 0.57,精密度为0.86升/分钟。两种方法之间的平均百分比差异为 - 10.8±16.0%。
在稳定的患者中,通过这种新型代谢监测仪测量VO2和VCO2的双血氧饱和度法获得的心输出量测量值,与使用热稀释法测量的值具有良好的相关性。从VCO2计算的心输出量值比从VO2计算的值更准确、更精确。这些测量值在血流动力学不稳定的患者以及各种机械通气模式下的有效性似乎是有依据的。