Vernon S W
University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health 77225, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Oct 1;89(19):1406-22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.19.1406.
The purpose of this review is to evaluate the published literature on adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy. Specifically, the review addresses the following: 1) prevalence of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 2) interventions to increase adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 3) correlates or predictors of adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; and 4) reasons for nonadherence. Other objectives are to put the literature on CRC screening adherence in the context of recently reported findings from experimental interventions to change prevention and early detection behaviors and to suggest directions for future research on CRC screening adherence. CRC screening offers the potential both for primary and for secondary prevention. Data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey show that 26% of the population more than 49 years of age report FOBT within the past 3 years and 33% report ever having had sigmoidoscopy. The Year 2000 goals set forth in Healthy People 2000 are for 50% of the population more than 49 years of age to report FOBT within the past 2 years and for 40% to report that they ever had sigmoidoscopy. Thus, systematic efforts to increase CRC screening are warranted. To date, attempts to promote CRC screening have used both a public health model that targets entire communities, e.g., mass media campaigns, and a medical model that targets individuals, e.g., general practice patients. Most of these efforts, however, did not include systematic evaluation of strategies to increase adherence. The data on FOBT show that the median adherence rate to programmatic offers of FOBT is between 40% and 50%, depending on the type of population offered the test, e.g., patients or employees. Approximately, 50% of those initially offered testing in unselected populations will respond to minimal prompts or interventions. A salient issue for FOBT, however, is whether or not the behavior can be sustained over time. Fewer studies examined adherence to sigmoidoscopy. Adherence was highest in relatives of CRC cases and in employer-sponsored programs offered to workers at increased risk of CRC. At present, we know very little about the determinants of CRC screening behaviors, particularly as they relate to rescreening.
本综述的目的是评估已发表的关于粪便潜血试验(FOBT)和乙状结肠镜检查在结直肠癌(CRC)筛查中依从性的文献。具体而言,该综述涉及以下方面:1)FOBT和乙状结肠镜检查的普及率;2)提高FOBT和乙状结肠镜检查依从性的干预措施;3)FOBT和乙状结肠镜检查依从性的相关因素或预测因素;4)不依从的原因。其他目标是将关于CRC筛查依从性的文献置于最近报道的旨在改变预防和早期检测行为的实验性干预研究结果的背景下,并为未来关于CRC筛查依从性的研究提出方向。CRC筛查具有一级预防和二级预防的潜力。1992年全国健康访谈调查的数据显示,49岁以上人群中,26%报告在过去3年内进行过FOBT,33%报告曾接受过乙状结肠镜检查。《健康人民2000》设定的2000年目标是,49岁以上人群中50%报告在过去2年内进行过FOBT,40%报告曾接受过乙状结肠镜检查。因此,有必要系统地努力增加CRC筛查。迄今为止,促进CRC筛查的尝试既采用了针对整个社区的公共卫生模式,如大众媒体宣传活动,也采用了针对个体的医疗模式,如全科医疗患者。然而,这些努力大多没有包括对提高依从性策略的系统评估。关于FOBT的数据表明,根据接受检测的人群类型(如患者或员工),FOBT项目提供的检测的中位依从率在40%至50%之间。在未经过筛选的人群中,最初接受检测的人中约50%会对最少的提示或干预做出反应。然而,FOBT的一个突出问题是这种行为能否长期持续。研究乙状结肠镜检查依从性的研究较少。在CRC病例的亲属以及为CRC风险增加的工人提供的雇主赞助项目中,依从性最高。目前,我们对CRC筛查行为的决定因素知之甚少,尤其是与再次筛查相关的因素。