Faller H, Bülzebruck H, Schilling S, Drings P, Lang H
Institut für Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie, Universität Würzburg. off
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1997 Jun;47(6):206-18.
The present prospective test study of hypotheses addressed the question whether psychological factors are predictive of survival time in lung cancer patients. The hypotheses were: Emotional distress, depression and depressive coping are associated with shorter survival; hope and active coping with longer survival. The study was based on a sample of n = 103 patients who were investigated post-diagnosis and before the beginning of primary treatment. Emotional distress and hope were assessed by clinical scales (self-reports and interviewer ratings), depression by the Depression Scale of von Zerssen, depressive coping and active coping by the Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping with illness by Muthny. At follow-up, which took place three to five years later, n = 74 patients had died, for n = 29 patients the survival data are censored. The prediction of the survival time was performed applying multivariate analyses (Kaplan-Meier-method, Cox-Regression), adjusting for biological risk factors (histological classification, stage of the disease, type and amount of treatment, Karnofsky performance status, age). Results were as follows: Active coping and hope were associated with longer survival, emotional distress, depression and depressive coping with shorter survival, respectively. These associations were found consistently across assessment methods. The predictive effects of coping and distress were statistically independent of the influence of the somatic risk factors. The best psychological predictor was the interviewer rating of active coping. Its predictive power equalled that of the Karnofsky performance status. However, there was evidence that the effects of the psychological factors varied somewhat in interaction with treatment modalities. The findings are discussed from a methodological perspective. Possible causal models and mechanisms are presented which could account for interactions of psychological measures and the course of the disease: Thus, it can be conceived that psychological effects were mediated by patients' compliance with medical treatment. In addition, it cannot be ruled out that psychological factors themselves were influenced by the physical status of the patients at the time of entry to the study.
本前瞻性假设检验研究探讨了心理因素是否能预测肺癌患者的生存时间这一问题。假设如下:情绪困扰、抑郁及抑郁应对方式与较短的生存期相关;希望及积极应对方式与较长的生存期相关。该研究基于103例患者的样本,这些患者在确诊后及开始初级治疗前接受了调查。情绪困扰和希望通过临床量表(自我报告和访谈者评分)进行评估,抑郁通过冯·泽尔森抑郁量表进行评估,抑郁应对方式和积极应对方式通过穆特尼编制的弗莱堡疾病应对问卷进行评估。在三到五年后的随访中,74例患者死亡,29例患者的生存数据被截尾。生存时间的预测采用多变量分析(卡普兰 - 迈耶法、考克斯回归),并对生物学风险因素(组织学分类、疾病分期、治疗类型和剂量、卡诺夫斯基功能状态、年龄)进行了校正。结果如下:积极应对方式和希望分别与较长的生存期相关,情绪困扰、抑郁及抑郁应对方式与较短的生存期相关。这些关联在不同的评估方法中均一致存在。应对方式和困扰的预测作用在统计学上独立于躯体风险因素 的影响。最佳的心理预测指标是访谈者对积极应对方式的评分。其预测能力与卡诺夫斯基功能状态相当。然而,有证据表明心理因素的影响在与治疗方式的相互作用中略有不同。从方法学角度对研究结果进行了讨论。提出了可能的因果模型和机制,这些模型和机制可以解释心理测量与疾病进程之间的相互作用:因此,可以设想心理效应是通过患者对医疗治疗的依从性来介导的。此外,不能排除心理因素本身在研究开始时受到患者身体状况的影响。