Stone C A
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 1997 Nov-Dec;30(6):660-9. doi: 10.1177/002221949703000610.
A group of 26 adolescents with learning disabilities (Grades 9 through 12), their parents, and their special education teachers were asked to rate the students' skills in each of 21 specific areas covering general ability, oral language, reading, written language, math, study skills, motivation, social skills, attention, and nonverbal skills. Correspondences in the absolute and relative ratings of parents, teachers, and students across the 21 skill areas were examined. The parents' ratings were consistent with those of the teachers in 16 areas and significantly lower than the teachers in 5 areas. The students' ratings were generally higher than those of their parents and teachers. The student-teacher differences were significant in 6 areas, whereas the student-parent differences were significant in 11 areas. Although generally lower in absolute terms than the ratings of their children, the parents' relative ratings were strikingly parallel to their children's ratings across skill areas (r = 80). Differences in the reference groups used for the ratings did not seem to account for the discrepant ratings. Possible implications of the differing perceptions of students' learning disabilities for students' self-esteem and academic progress are discussed.
一组26名有学习障碍的青少年(9至12年级)、他们的父母以及他们的特殊教育教师被要求对学生在21个特定领域的技能进行评分,这些领域涵盖一般能力、口语、阅读、书面语言、数学、学习技能、动机、社交技能、注意力和非语言技能。研究了父母、教师和学生在21个技能领域的绝对评分和相对评分之间的对应关系。父母的评分在16个领域与教师的评分一致,在5个领域显著低于教师的评分。学生的评分总体上高于他们的父母和教师。学生与教师的差异在6个领域显著,而学生与父母的差异在11个领域显著。尽管父母的绝对评分总体上低于他们孩子的评分,但父母在各个技能领域的相对评分与他们孩子的评分惊人地相似(r = 0.80)。评分所使用的参照组差异似乎无法解释这些不一致的评分。文中讨论了对学生学习障碍的不同认知对学生自尊和学业进步可能产生的影响。