Clark W R, Mueller B A, Kraus M A, Macias W L
Renal Division, Baxter Healthcare Corp, McGaw Park, IL 60085, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Nov;30(5 Suppl 4):S10-4. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90536-9.
The recognition that both morbidity and mortality are inversely related to delivered hemodialysis (HD) dose in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients has substantially changed clinical practices in the United States. A number of quantification techniques, which differ greatly in complexity and sophistication, are now used in ESRD patients. Investigators recently have attempted to extrapolate some of these ESRD quantification methods to the acute renal failure (ARF) setting. This review focuses on these recent attempts. Both patient-related and renal replacement therapy (RRT)-related differences in ESRD and ARF are discussed. In addition, the potential pitfalls of extrapolating certain ESRD quantification methods to RRT in ARF are discussed. Prescription considerations for both intermittent HD (IHD) and continuous RRT (CRRT) are presented. The optimal technique for RRT quantification in ARF remains to be determined.
认识到终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的发病率和死亡率均与所给予的血液透析(HD)剂量呈负相关,这极大地改变了美国的临床实践。目前,ESRD患者使用了许多量化技术,这些技术在复杂性和精密程度上差异很大。研究人员最近试图将其中一些ESRD量化方法外推至急性肾衰竭(ARF)情况。本综述重点关注这些近期的尝试。文中讨论了ESRD和ARF中与患者相关及与肾脏替代治疗(RRT)相关的差异。此外,还讨论了将某些ESRD量化方法外推至ARF的RRT时可能存在的陷阱。介绍了间歇性HD(IHD)和连续性RRT(CRRT)的处方注意事项。ARF中RRT量化的最佳技术仍有待确定。