Quin J W
Division of Medicine, Liverpool Health Services, Sydney, NSW.
Aust N Z J Med. 1997 Oct;27(5):611-7; discussion 617-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1997.tb00985.x.
Hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection poses a major health problem for Australia. Currently interferon therapy is approved only for people with chronic infection, yet the literature contains a number of studies that show that there is a better response to interferon in symptomatic acute HCV.
To review the response to interferon therapy in acute HCV by way of meta-analysis.
This study was a retrospective review of the data on the use of interferon therapy in acute HCV. The meta-analysis was performed using the methods of DerSimonian and Laird. Data were presented by calculating the risk difference which estimated efficacy by calculating the proportion of patients in treatment groups who responded better (0 to +1.0) or worse (0 to -1.0) than untreated control groups.
A meta-analysis of six studies on the use of 3MU of interferon alpha 2b (IFN-alpha 2b) three times a week for six to 24 weeks showed a significant response as measured by long term (> 12 months) normalisation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and clearance of HCV RNA (as measured by polymerase chain reaction). The risk of difference was +0.31 (95% CI of +0.19 to +0.43, p < 0.01) and +0.33 (95% CI of +0.08 to +0.58, p < 0.001) respectively. Slightly better results were seen with daily doses of 3MU of interferon beta (IFN-beta) given intravenously over four to seven weeks. This produced a risk difference of +0.57 (95% CI of +0.26 to +0.88, p < 0.02) for normalisation of ALT and +0.83 (95% CI of +0.61 to 1.00, p < 0.001) for clearance of HCV. Results for higher daily doses of both IFN alpha and beta were limited to a few studies and most were uncontrolled. 6MU of IFN-alpha 2b three times a week for 16 to 24 weeks produced a risk difference of +0.53 (95% CI +0.17 to +0.89, p < 0.05) for normalisation of ALT and +0.44 (95% CI +0.06 to +0.82) for clearance of HCV RNA. Results with 6MU daily for eight weeks of IFN-beta in an uncontrolled study, showed up to 90% patients cleared HCV long term. Preliminary results with 10MU of IFN-alpha 2b daily for four to six weeks also showed long term clearance of HCV RNA and normalisation of ALT in 90% of treated patients.
Short term (six weeks to six months) treatment of symptomatic acute HCV with interferon (both alpha and beta) produced a better long term response rate than prolonged therapy (> 12 months) in chronic HCV. Daily doses of 6MU and 10MU produced better responses than 3MU but more studies are needed to determine the optimum regime.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染给澳大利亚带来了一个重大的健康问题。目前,干扰素疗法仅被批准用于慢性感染患者,但文献中有多项研究表明,有症状的急性HCV患者对干扰素的反应更好。
通过荟萃分析来回顾急性HCV患者对干扰素治疗的反应。
本研究是对急性HCV患者使用干扰素治疗的数据进行的回顾性研究。荟萃分析采用DerSimonian和Laird的方法进行。通过计算风险差异来呈现数据,该差异通过计算治疗组中反应优于(0至+1.0)或差于(0至 -1.0)未治疗对照组的患者比例来估计疗效。
对六项关于每周三次使用3MU的干扰素α2b(IFN-α2b),持续六至24周的研究进行荟萃分析,结果显示,通过丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)长期(>12个月)恢复正常和HCV RNA清除(通过聚合酶链反应测量)来衡量,有显著反应。风险差异分别为+0.31(95%置信区间为+0.19至+0.43,p<0.01)和+0.33(95%置信区间为+0.08至+0.58,p<0.001)。在四至七周内静脉注射每日剂量3MU的干扰素β(IFN-β),效果稍好。这使得ALT恢复正常的风险差异为+0.57(95%置信区间为+0.26至+0.88,p<0.02),HCV清除的风险差异为+0.83(95%置信区间为+0.61至1.00,p<0.001)。关于更高每日剂量的IFNα和IFNβ的研究结果仅限于少数研究,且大多数无对照。每周三次使用6MU的IFN-α2b,持续16至24周,ALT恢复正常的风险差异为+0.53(95%置信区间为+0.17至+0.89,p<0.05),HCV RNA清除的风险差异为+0.44(95%置信区间为+0.06至+0.82)。在一项无对照研究中,每日使用6MU的IFN-β,持续八周,结果显示高达90%的患者长期清除了HCV。每日使用10MU的IFN-α2b,持续四至六周的初步结果也显示,90%的治疗患者长期清除了HCV RNA且ALT恢复正常。
用干扰素(α和β)对有症状的急性HCV进行短期(六周至六个月)治疗,与慢性HCV的长期治疗(>12个月)相比,长期反应率更高。每日剂量6MU和10MU的反应优于3MU,但需要更多研究来确定最佳治疗方案。