Suppr超能文献

阑尾周围脓肿保守治疗与早期手术干预的比较评估——一项临床研究

Comparative evaluation of conservative management versus early surgical intervention in appendicular mass--a clinical study.

作者信息

Garg P, Dass B K, Bansal A R, Chitkara N

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak.

出版信息

J Indian Med Assoc. 1997 Jun;95(6):179-80, 196.

PMID:9420396
Abstract

The management of appendicular mass seems to be taking turn with the availability of better antibiotics, care and anaesthesia. Quite a few workers turned to the other extreme of traditional conservative approach and reported acceptable results with immediate intervention during phlegmonous stage. But practically, surgeons still continue to adopt the same old regime. To alleviate this fear and circumvent the disadvantages of immediate intervention a midpath regime called early appendicectomy has been clinically evaluated. With this new approach in the present study preventing misdiagnosis (15%), no chance of recurrence as also of missing in the follow-up and shorter overall hospital stay with economy are some strong reasons to adopt this regime.

摘要

随着更有效的抗生素、护理和麻醉技术的出现,阑尾周围脓肿的治疗方式似乎正在发生转变。不少研究人员转向了传统保守治疗方法的另一个极端,报告称在蜂窝织炎阶段立即进行干预可取得可接受的效果。但实际上,外科医生仍继续采用旧有的治疗方案。为了消除这种担忧并规避立即干预的弊端,一种名为早期阑尾切除术的中间治疗方案已在临床上进行了评估。在本研究中,采用这种新方法可防止误诊(15%),不存在复发和随访中漏诊的可能性,且总体住院时间更短、费用更低,这些都是采用该治疗方案的有力理由。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验