Burman W J, Reves R R, Rietmeijer C A, Cohn D L
Denver Disease Control Service, Denver Health and Hospitals, Colorado, USA.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997 Apr;1(2):163-9.
Urban county medical center.
To compare clinical outcomes associated with two treatment regimens for AIDS-associated disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (DMAC). From 1989 to mid-1992, patients were treated with rifampin, ethambutol, and clofazimine; in mid-1992 clarithromycin replaced rifampin.
A retrospective review of patients with DMAC; the main outcome measures assessed were toxicity associated with DMAC treatment, transfusions after the diagnosis of DMAC, and survival.
88 patients received the rifampin-based regimen and 86 were treated with the clarithromycin-based regimen. Drug-related adverse events were recorded less frequently with clarithromycin treatment (21% vs. 42%, P = 0.005), and additional antimycobacterial agents were used less often (28% vs. 44%, P = 0.04). In a multivariate logistic regression model, severe anemia at the time of DMAC diagnosis was associated with transfusion-dependence (relative risk [RR] 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2, 13.8, P < 0.001) and clarithromycin treatment was inversely associated with transfusion dependence (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1, 0.98, P = 0.04). In a multivariate Cox regression model including other factors affecting survival, clarithromycin treatment did not confer a survival advantage (P = 0.74).
The clarithromycin-containing regimen was better tolerated and was associated with substantially lower transfusion requirements than the rifampin-based regimen; survival was not affected.
城市县医疗中心。
比较两种治疗方案用于艾滋病相关播散性鸟分枝杆菌复合体(DMAC)的临床疗效。1989年至1992年年中,患者接受利福平、乙胺丁醇和氯法齐明治疗;1992年年中,克拉霉素取代了利福平。
对DMAC患者进行回顾性研究;评估的主要结局指标为DMAC治疗相关毒性、DMAC诊断后的输血情况及生存率。
88例患者接受基于利福平的治疗方案,86例接受基于克拉霉素的治疗方案。克拉霉素治疗记录的药物相关不良事件较少(21%对42%,P = 0.005),额外使用抗分枝杆菌药物的情况也较少(28%对44%,P = 0.04)。在多因素逻辑回归模型中,DMAC诊断时的严重贫血与输血依赖相关(相对风险[RR] 5.6,95%置信区间[CI] 2.2,13.8,P < 0.001),而克拉霉素治疗与输血依赖呈负相关(RR 0.4,95% CI 0.1,0.98,P = 0.04)。在包含其他影响生存因素的多因素Cox回归模型中,克拉霉素治疗未显示出生存优势(P = 0.74)。
与基于利福平的治疗方案相比,含克拉霉素的治疗方案耐受性更好,输血需求显著更低;生存未受影响。