Yue W, Brodie A M
Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201, USA.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1997 Nov-Dec;63(4-6):317-28. doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(97)00072-1.
Selective inhibition of estrogen production with aromatase inhibitors has been found to be an effective strategy for breast cancer treatment. Most studies have focused on inhibitor screening and in vitro kinetic analysis of aromatase inhibition using placental microsomes. In order to determine the effects of different inhibitors on aromatase in the whole cell, we have utilized the human choriocarcinoma cell line, JEG-3 in culture to compare and study three classes of aromatase inhibitors, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, fadrozole (CGS 16949A), and aminoglutethimide. Fadrozole is the most potent competitive inhibitor and aminoglutethimide is the least potent among the three. However, stimulation of aromatase activity was found to occur when JEG-3 cells were preincubated with aminoglutethimide. In contrast, 4-OHA and fadrozole caused sustained inhibition of aromatase activity in both JEG-3 cells and placental microsomes, which was not reversed even after the removal of the inhibitors. 4-OHA bound irreversibly to the active site of aromatase and caused inactivation of the enzyme which followed pseudo-first order kinetics. However, 4-OHA appears to be metabolized rapidly in JEG-3 cells. Sustained inhibition of aromatase induced by fadrozole occurs by a different mechanism. Although fadrozole bound tightly to aromatase at a site distinct from the steroid binding site, the inhibition of aromatase activity by fadrozole does not involve a reactive process. None of the inhibitors stimulated aromatase mRNA synthesis in JEG-3 cells during 8 h treatment. The stimulation of aromatase activity by AG appeared to be due to stabilization of aromatase protein. According to these results, 4-OHA and fadrozole would be expected to be more beneficial in the treatment of breast cancer patients than AG. The increase in aromatase activity by AG may counteract its therapeutic effect and might be partially responsible for relapse of breast cancer patients from this treatment.
已发现用芳香化酶抑制剂选择性抑制雌激素生成是治疗乳腺癌的有效策略。大多数研究集中于抑制剂筛选以及使用胎盘微粒体对芳香化酶抑制进行体外动力学分析。为了确定不同抑制剂对全细胞中芳香化酶的影响,我们利用培养的人绒毛膜癌细胞系JEG-3来比较和研究三类芳香化酶抑制剂,即4-羟基雄烯二酮、法倔唑(CGS 16949A)和氨鲁米特。法倔唑是三种抑制剂中最有效的竞争性抑制剂,而氨鲁米特效力最低。然而,发现当JEG-3细胞与氨鲁米特预孵育时会出现芳香化酶活性的刺激。相反,4-羟基雄烯二酮和法倔唑在JEG-3细胞和胎盘微粒体中均导致芳香化酶活性的持续抑制,即使在去除抑制剂后这种抑制也不会逆转。4-羟基雄烯二酮不可逆地结合到芳香化酶的活性位点并导致酶失活,失活过程遵循假一级动力学。然而,4-羟基雄烯二酮在JEG-3细胞中似乎快速代谢。法倔唑诱导的芳香化酶持续抑制通过不同机制发生。尽管法倔唑在与类固醇结合位点不同的位点紧密结合到芳香化酶,但法倔唑对芳香化酶活性的抑制不涉及反应过程。在8小时处理期间,没有一种抑制剂刺激JEG-3细胞中芳香化酶mRNA的合成。氨鲁米特对芳香化酶活性的刺激似乎是由于芳香化酶蛋白的稳定。根据这些结果,预计4-羟基雄烯二酮和法倔唑在治疗乳腺癌患者方面比氨鲁米特更有益。氨鲁米特引起的芳香化酶活性增加可能会抵消其治疗效果,并且可能部分导致乳腺癌患者接受这种治疗后复发。