Spencer M A
Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Hum Evol. 1998 Jan;34(1):25-54. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0180.
Studies of the influence of dietary selection pressures in living and extinct primate taxa frequently interpret cranial diversity using a simple lever model. When this model is applied to functional or evolutionary questions, it is commonly assumed that the muscles of mastication vary little in activity during biting at points along the tooth row. A pattern of smoothly increasing maximum bite force magnitudes is therefore predicted as the bite point is moved posteriorly along the dental arcade. Diverse adaptive explanations are mapped onto this pattern. In this study, the activity of the superficial masseter and anterior temporalis muscles in humans was quantified during high magnitude bite force production at points along the tooth row. These data indicate that there are substantial changes in muscle activity with bite point, and that the standard lever model is therefore an incomplete description of masticatory force production. Maximum muscle force magnitudes were found to be greatest during first molar biting and to decrease as the bite point moved anteriorly and posteriorly. Additionally, relative balancing and working side muscle activity changed by bite point. This latter pattern is consistent with the predictions of Greaves' constrained lever model, which assumes that masticatory muscle activity is restricted by the need to maintain compressive forces at both temporomandibular joints. However, these results also imply that additional factors influence muscle activity--such as dental morphology, mandibular kinematics, and the need to safeguard against joint distraction during diverse loading conditions--and that the constrained lever model of Greaves is therefore also incomplete. These considerations suggest that masticatory system morphology in primates will respond differently to dietary selection pressures than is commonly hypothesized. Intepretations of cranial morphology in fossil taxa may therefore also differ.
对现存和已灭绝灵长类动物分类群中饮食选择压力影响的研究,常常使用一个简单的杠杆模型来解释颅骨多样性。当这个模型应用于功能或进化问题时,通常假定在沿着齿列的各个点进行咬合时,咀嚼肌的活动变化不大。因此,随着咬点沿着牙弓向后移动,预计会出现最大咬力大小平稳增加的模式。各种适应性解释都与这种模式相关联。在本研究中,对人类沿齿列各点产生高强度咬力时的咬肌浅层和颞肌前部的活动进行了量化。这些数据表明,肌肉活动随咬点有显著变化,因此标准杠杆模型对咀嚼力产生的描述并不完整。发现最大肌肉力量大小在第一磨牙咬合时最大,并随着咬点向前和向后移动而减小。此外,相对平衡和工作侧的肌肉活动因咬点而改变。后一种模式与格里夫斯的受限杠杆模型的预测一致,该模型假定咀嚼肌活动受到在两个颞下颌关节维持压缩力的需要的限制。然而,这些结果也意味着还有其他因素影响肌肉活动——如牙齿形态、下颌运动学以及在不同负荷条件下防止关节脱位的需要——因此格里夫斯的受限杠杆模型也不完整。这些考虑表明,灵长类动物的咀嚼系统形态对饮食选择压力的反应可能与通常假设的不同。因此,对化石分类群颅骨形态的解释也可能不同。