Cockburn J, Sutherland M, Cappiello M, Hevern M
Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria, Melbourne.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Dec;21(7):739-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01790.x.
This study aimed to identify factors that predicted attendance at a relocatable screening mammography service in a rural centre in Victoria. A cohort design was used whereby 180 women from the target population were interviewed by telephone two weeks before the service moved to the area for a 10-week period of operation. Attendance data were ascertained from service records. Fifty per cent of the sample attended the service. Significant predictors of attendance were: mammographic history, with women who reported previous screening mammography being less likely to attend than women who had not had a previous mammogram (odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.83); perception of personal risk for breast cancer, with women who perceived at least some risk being more likely to attend than women who perceived no risk (OR 2.73, CI 1.07 to 6.99); stated intention of attending (OR 2.01, CI 1.49 to 2.71); knowing the correct location of the service (OR 3.08, CI 1.37 to 6.89); and education, with higher education being associated with a lower likelihood of attending (OR 0.65, CI 0.44 to 0.96). Our study raised some issues, including the high prevalence of rural women who reported a previous screening mammogram, although BreastScreen services had not previously been available in their area; factors underlying perceptions of personal risk for breast cancer; and the generalisability of our finding of an inverse relationship between higher education and attendance for screening.
本研究旨在确定能够预测维多利亚州一个农村中心可移动乳腺筛查服务就诊率的因素。采用队列设计,在该服务迁至该地区开展为期10周的运营前两周,通过电话对目标人群中的180名女性进行了访谈。就诊数据从服务记录中获取。样本中有50%的人使用了该服务。就诊的显著预测因素包括:乳腺钼靶检查史,报告曾接受过乳腺钼靶筛查的女性比未接受过筛查的女性就诊可能性更低(优势比(OR)0.38,95%置信区间(CI)0.17至0.83);对个人患乳腺癌风险的认知,认为至少有一定风险的女性比认为无风险的女性就诊可能性更高(OR 2.73,CI 1.07至6.99);表明的就诊意向(OR 2.01,CI 1.49至2.71);知道服务的正确地点(OR 3.08,CI 1.37至6.89);以及教育程度,高等教育与较低的就诊可能性相关(OR 0.65,CI 0.44至0.96)。我们的研究提出了一些问题,包括尽管该地区此前没有乳腺筛查服务,但报告曾接受过乳腺钼靶筛查的农村女性比例较高;对个人患乳腺癌风险认知的潜在因素;以及我们发现的高等教育与筛查就诊率之间的负相关关系的普遍性。