Strom B L, Schinnar R, Bilker W B, Feldman H, Farrar J T, Carson J L
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104-6021, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(22):2626-31.
The risk of gastrointestinal tract bleeding requiring hospitalization associated with naproxen sodium was compared with that with ibuprofen, using a prescription database to approximate over-the-counter dosing.
To evaluate the safety of naproxen sodium.
A claims database containing Ohio Medicaid data from January 1986 through February 1993 and Michigan Medicaid data from April 1983 through July 1993 was used to compare 101,318 patients dispensed naproxen sodium with 277,601 patients dispensed ibuprofen. Using a case-cohort design, all 59 patients from the full cohort who had been hospitalized with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB) that developed within 14 days after the first prescription for the study drugs were compared with a subcohort made up of a 10% random sample of subjects selected from the combined drug cohorts.
The incidence of UGIB occurring within 14 days after the first prescription in the naproxen sodium cohort was 26 (0.026%) of 101,318 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.017%-0.038%), compared with 33 (0.012%) of 277,601 patients (95% CI, 0.008%-0.017%) in the ibuprofen cohort. Overall, the use of naproxen sodium vs ibuprofen was associated with an adjusted relative risk of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1-3.8). Among people with multiple prescriptions, the crude relative risk for those receiving therapy in a dose typical of over-the-counter use was 4.1 (95% CI, 1.2-13.8).
The overall incidence of UGIB is low with both drugs. There is little additional absolute risk posed by the use of low-dose naproxen sodium, compared with low-dose ibuprofen, despite an increased relative risk. However, given the widespread use of these drugs, a substantial number of additional cases of UGIB could result from use of naproxen sodium. This increased risk should be considered, especially for patients whose baseline risk of UGIB is elevated.
利用处方数据库估算非处方剂量,比较了萘普生钠与布洛芬导致需住院治疗的胃肠道出血风险。
评估萘普生钠的安全性。
使用一个包含1986年1月至1993年2月俄亥俄州医疗补助数据以及1983年4月至1993年7月密歇根州医疗补助数据的索赔数据库,对101,318名配发萘普生钠的患者与277,601名配发布洛芬的患者进行比较。采用病例队列设计,将整个队列中在首次开具研究药物处方后14天内发生上消化道出血(UGIB)并住院的所有59名患者,与从联合药物队列中选取的10%随机样本组成的子队列进行比较。
萘普生钠队列中首次处方后14天内发生UGIB的发生率为101,318人中的26人(0.026%)(95%置信区间[CI],0.017% - 0.038%),而布洛芬队列中277,601名患者中有33人(0.012%)(95% CI,0.008% - 0.017%)。总体而言,使用萘普生钠与布洛芬相比,调整后的相对风险为2.0(95% CI,1.1 - 3.8)。在有多次处方的人群中,接受非处方典型剂量治疗者的粗相对风险为4.1(95% CI,1.2 - 13.8)。
两种药物导致UGIB的总体发生率都较低。与低剂量布洛芬相比,使用低剂量萘普生钠虽相对风险增加,但绝对风险增加不大。然而,鉴于这些药物的广泛使用,使用萘普生钠可能导致大量额外的UGIB病例。应考虑这种增加的风险, 尤其是UGIB基线风险升高的患者。