Rowinsky E K, Baker S D, Burks K, O'Reilly S, Donehower R C, Grochow L B
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ann Oncol. 1998 Feb;9(2):173-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1008266630701.
The premise for this study was that topotecan (TPT) resistance in preclinical studies is associated with low level expression of the p-glycoprotein (Pgp) multi-drug transporter conferred by the multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype, which might be overcome in clinical practice by administering moderately (2.3-fold) higher doses of TPT that have shown to be feasible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. This phase II study evaluated the anti-tumor activity of TPT administered at its highest possible solid tumor dose with G-SCF in patients with fluoropyrimidine-refractory advanced colorectal carcinoma. The study also sought to identify pharmacodynamic (PD) determinants of both activity and toxicity.
TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for five days every three weeks at a dose of 3.5 mg/m2/day to patients with advance colorectal carcinoma who developed progressive disease either during treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for advanced disease or within six months after receiving fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. This dose of TPT was previously determined to be the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) with G-CSF support in a phase I study involving solid tumor patients with similar risk factors for myelosuppression. Plasma sampling with performed during course 1 to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) and PD behavior of TPT.
Seventeen patients who received 89 courses of TPT and G-CSF were evaluable for toxicity; 16 patients were evaluable for anti-tumor response. Toxicity, particularly myelosuppression, was substantial. At the 3.5 mg/m2/day dose level, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) were less than 500/microliters for longer than 5 days in 17% of courses involving seven of seventeen (41%) patients. Severe neutropenia associated with fever occurred in 12.3% of courses; and platelet counts below 25,000/microliters were noted in 26.9% of courses. These toxicities resulted in dose reductions in seven of 17 (41%) patients. Nevertheless, 90% of the planned total dose of TPT was administered. No major responses were observed, though minor activity was noted in several patients. Both the median time to progression and the median survival time were short--2.5 and 4 months respectively. Although interindividual variability in the disposition of total TPT was observed, the lack of objective responses precluded PD assessments related to disease activity. Total TPT exposure was significantly higher than drug exposure achieved in similar patients at an identical dose in a previous phase I study of TPT and G-CSF, which may explain why more severe myelosuppressive effects occurred in the present study. There were no PD relationships evident between relevant PK parameters and the percent decrements in platelets and ANC's during course 1, although patients with severe toxic effects (ANC below 500/microliters for more than five days and/or platelets < 25,000/microliters) had higher drug exposure than patients with less severe toxicity (P < 0.018 and P = 0.09, respectively).
Based on these results, the true response rate of TPT at its solid tumor MTD with G-CSF support is unlikely to approach 20%. Although a response rate of less than 20% might be viewed as significant in this disease setting and might be confirmed with sufficient statistical certainty by treating additional patients, the substantial toxicity, inconvenience, and cost associated with this high dose TPT/G-CSF regimen does not warrant the acceptance of a lower level of anti-tumor activity as a criterion for further development.
本研究的前提是,在临床前研究中,拓扑替康(TPT)耐药与多药耐药(MDR)表型赋予的P-糖蛋白(Pgp)多药转运蛋白低水平表达相关,在临床实践中,通过给予适度(2.3倍)更高剂量的TPT(已证明在粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)支持下可行),这一情况可能会得到克服。本II期研究评估了在G-SCF支持下,以最高可能的实体瘤剂量给予TPT对氟嘧啶难治性晚期结直肠癌患者的抗肿瘤活性。该研究还试图确定活性和毒性的药效学(PD)决定因素。
对于在晚期疾病的氟嘧啶类化疗期间或接受氟嘧啶类辅助化疗后六个月内出现疾病进展的晚期结直肠癌患者,TPT以3.5mg/m²/天的剂量每三周每日输注30分钟,共五天。在一项涉及具有类似骨髓抑制风险因素的实体瘤患者的I期研究中,该TPT剂量先前已被确定为在G-CSF支持下的最大耐受剂量(MTD)。在第1疗程期间进行血浆采样,以表征TPT的药代动力学(PK)和PD行为。
17例接受了89疗程TPT和G-CSF治疗的患者可评估毒性;16例患者可评估抗肿瘤反应。毒性,尤其是骨髓抑制,较为严重。在3.5mg/m²/天的剂量水平下,在涉及17例患者中的7例(41%)的17%的疗程中,绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)低于500/微升的时间超过5天。12.3%的疗程出现与发热相关的严重中性粒细胞减少;26.9%的疗程血小板计数低于25,000/微升。这些毒性导致17例患者中的7例(41%)剂量降低。尽管如此,TPT计划总剂量的90%得以给予。未观察到主要反应,尽管在几名患者中注意到轻微活性。疾病进展的中位时间和中位生存时间均较短,分别为2.5个月和4个月。尽管观察到总TPT处置的个体间变异性,但缺乏客观反应使得无法进行与疾病活性相关的PD评估。总TPT暴露显著高于先前TPT和G-CSF的I期研究中相同剂量的类似患者所达到的药物暴露,这可能解释了为什么在本研究中出现了更严重的骨髓抑制作用。在第1疗程期间,相关PK参数与血小板和ANC百分比下降之间没有明显的PD关系,尽管具有严重毒性作用(ANC低于500/微升超过五天和/或血小板<25,000/微升)的患者比毒性较轻的患者具有更高的药物暴露(分别为P<0.018和P = 0.09)。
基于这些结果,在G-CSF支持下,TPT在其实体瘤MTD时的真实反应率不太可能接近20%。尽管在这种疾病背景下,低于20%的反应率可能被视为有意义,并且通过治疗更多患者可能以足够的统计学确定性得到证实,但这种高剂量TPT/G-CSF方案相关的严重毒性、不便和成本并不足以接受较低水平的抗肿瘤活性作为进一步开发的标准。