Cortés O, García C, Pérez L, Bravo L A
Dental School, University of Murcia, Spain.
ASDC J Dent Child. 1998 Jan-Feb;65(1):29-31.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of two resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements to etched and unetched enamel and to dentin. Thirty-six noncarious human premolar teeth were used. Flat buccal and lingual surfaces were prepared. Dyract and Compoglass were used. The teeth were distributed at random into six groups of six teeth each. The materials were handled according to manufacturers' instructions. In groups 1 and 3 the enamel was etched with 37 percent phosphoric acid. All samples were sheared with an Autograph AG5 machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Two way ANOVA and comparison with the Tukey test were used to evaluate the results. These showed that on etched enamel Dyract had a significantly higher bond strength (p = 0.02); on unetched enamel Compoglass had a statistically higher bond strength (p = 0.003), and on dentin the materials provided the same bond strength. Overall, disregarding surfaces, there was no difference between the two materials.
本研究的目的是评估两种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀与酸蚀和未酸蚀的牙釉质及牙本质之间的粘结强度。使用了36颗无龋的人类前磨牙。制备平坦的颊面和舌面。使用了Dyract和Compoglass。将牙齿随机分为六组,每组六颗。材料按照制造商的说明进行处理。第1组和第3组的牙釉质用37%的磷酸进行酸蚀。所有样本均使用Autograph AG5机器以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度进行剪切。采用双向方差分析并与Tukey检验进行比较来评估结果。结果显示,在酸蚀牙釉质上,Dyract的粘结强度显著更高(p = 0.02);在未酸蚀牙釉质上,Compoglass的粘结强度在统计学上更高(p = 0.003),而在牙本质上,两种材料的粘结强度相同。总体而言,不考虑表面情况,两种材料之间没有差异。