Slaughter V
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):321-32.
Two studies demonstrate dissociation between children's understanding of pictorial representations (photos and drawings) and mental representations (beliefs). In Study 1, 37 preschoolers were tested on false belief, appearance-reality, false photo, and false drawing tasks. The false picture tasks were significantly easier, and no correlation was found between children's performances on false belief and false picture tasks. In Study 2, 30 children who failed a false belief pretest were randomly assigned to 3 training groups: Belief (trained on false belief tasks), Picture (trained on false picture tasks), or Control (trained on number conservation tasks). Training was conducted in 2 sessions over the course of 2 weeks; tasks were presented and feedback was provided. All children were posttested on theory of mind tasks, false picture tasks, and a number conservation task. The posttest results showed differential patterns of performance, with the Belief group scoring highest on the theory of mind posttests, the Picture group scoring highest on the false picture posttests, and the Control group scoring highest on the number conservation posttest. Results are discussed with respect to competing models of theory of mind development.
两项研究表明,儿童对图片表征(照片和图画)的理解与心理表征(信念)之间存在分离。在研究1中,对37名学龄前儿童进行了错误信念、表象-现实、错误照片和错误图画任务的测试。错误图画任务明显更容易,并且在儿童的错误信念任务和错误图画任务表现之间未发现相关性。在研究2中,将30名未能通过错误信念预测试的儿童随机分配到3个训练组:信念组(接受错误信念任务训练)、图画组(接受错误图画任务训练)或控制组(接受数字守恒任务训练)。训练在2周内分2次进行;呈现任务并提供反馈。所有儿童都接受了心理理论任务、错误图画任务和数字守恒任务的后测。后测结果显示出不同的表现模式,信念组在心理理论后测中得分最高,图画组在错误图画后测中得分最高,控制组在数字守恒后测中得分最高。针对心理理论发展的竞争模型对结果进行了讨论。