Nabavi D G, Droste D W, Kemény V, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Weber S, Ringelstein E B
Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Germany.
Stroke. 1998 May;29(5):949-54. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.5.949.
Ultrasonography (US) is a well-established method used to assess the brain-supplying arteries in the acute stroke setting. However, several technical and anatomic limitations are known to reduce its diagnostic accuracy and confidence level. Echocontrast agents (ECA) are known to improve the signal-to-noise ratio by enhancing the intensity of the reflecting Doppler signal. We undertook this prospective study to evaluate the diagnostic value of ECA in a consecutive, nonselected cohort of acute stroke patients with insufficient native US investigations.
During a 1-year period, 25 patients were examined within 48 hours of the onset of stroke. The need for ECA was due to an insufficient transtemporal (n=18), transforaminal (n=4), or extracranial (n=3) imaging of arteries potentially involved in the ischemic event. In 12 patients, a diagnostic suspicion could natively be raised, whereas in the other 13 patients, the strongly reduced image quality did not allow for any neurovascular conclusions. Four grams of Levovist was injected at a concentration of 200 mg/mL and 400 mg/mL for the extracranial and transcranial insonations, respectively. The effect of the echocontrast enhancement was assessed with respect to (1) signal enhancement, (2) image quality, (3) final diagnostic confidence, and (4) the need for additional neurovascular imaging methods.
In all but one patient (96%), a strong signal enhancement was noted, leading to a moderate (n=11) or strong improvement (n=10) of the transcranial image quality. Thus in a total of 18 patients (72%), the echoenhancement provided a neurovascular diagnosis of sufficient confidence. This led to the confirmation of the previously suspected findings and disclosed three further occlusions and four stenoses of the intracranial arteries. In contrast, for the three extracranial examinations the image quality was not sufficiently improved because of persistent color artifacts derived from adjacent neck vessels. Besides the seven patients with inconclusive examinations, five patients with conclusive echoenhanced US studies (48% in total) demanded additive neurovascular imaging studies, based on the clinical decision of the attending physicians. This led to confirmation of all high-confident sonographic diagnoses.
In summary, in approximately three fourths of our acute stroke patients with insufficient native US investigations, echocontrast enhancement enabled a reliable neurovascular diagnosis, allowing the cancellation of additive neurovascular imaging procedures in half of our cohort. Our preliminary results suggest that ECA can reasonably support the early cerebrovascular workup in the acute stroke setting.
超声检查(US)是在急性卒中情况下评估脑供血动脉的一种成熟方法。然而,已知一些技术和解剖学上的局限性会降低其诊断准确性和可信度。超声造影剂(ECA)已知可通过增强反射多普勒信号的强度来提高信噪比。我们进行了这项前瞻性研究,以评估ECA在一组连续的、未经筛选的急性卒中患者中的诊断价值,这些患者的常规超声检查结果不充分。
在1年的时间里,对25例卒中发作后48小时内的患者进行了检查。需要使用ECA是因为潜在参与缺血事件的动脉的颞部(n = 18)、经椎间孔(n = 4)或颅外(n = 3)成像不充分。在12例患者中,原本可以提出诊断怀疑,而在其他13例患者中,图像质量严重下降,无法得出任何神经血管方面的结论。分别以200 mg/mL和400 mg/mL的浓度注射4克声诺维用于颅外和经颅超声检查。从以下几个方面评估超声造影增强的效果:(1)信号增强,(2)图像质量,(3)最终诊断可信度,以及(4)是否需要额外的神经血管成像方法。
除1例患者外(96%),其余患者均观察到强烈的信号增强,使经颅图像质量得到中度(n = 11)或强烈改善(n = 10)。因此,总共18例患者(72%)中,超声造影增强提供了具有足够可信度的神经血管诊断。这导致先前怀疑的结果得到证实,并发现了另外3例颅内动脉闭塞和4例狭窄。相比之下,对于3例颅外检查,由于相邻颈部血管持续产生的彩色伪像,图像质量没有得到充分改善。除了7例检查结果不明确的患者外,5例超声造影增强超声检查结果明确的患者(总共48%)根据主治医生的临床判断需要进行额外的神经血管成像研究。这导致所有高可信度的超声诊断得到证实。
总之,在我们大约四分之三的常规超声检查结果不充分的急性卒中患者中,超声造影增强能够进行可靠的神经血管诊断,使我们队列中的一半患者无需进行额外的神经血管成像检查。我们的初步结果表明,ECA可以合理地支持急性卒中情况下的早期脑血管检查。