Johansson T
National Veterinary and Food Research Institute, Department of Food Microbiology, Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Mar 3;40(1-2):77-85. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00022-1.
Listeria monocytogenes blood agar (LMBA) was compared to Listeria selective agar based on lithium chloride and ceftazidime (LA) and to the Oxford and Palcam media recommended by ISO and IDF for the detection and enumeration of L. monocytogenes from foodstuffs and food-processing environments. LMBA is based on trypticase soy agar with the following additions: sheep blood (5%) and as selective agents lithium chloride (10 g/l), polymyxin B sulphate (10 mg/l) and ceftazidime (20 mg/l), whereas the selectivity of LA is based on lithium chloride (15 g/l) and ceftazidime (15 g/l). The media were compared in the detection of L. monocytogenes after enrichment from naturally contaminated foodstuffs (n = 423) and from food-processing environments (n = 93), and in the enumeration of the species from naturally contaminated foodstuffs (n = 287). LMBA was superior both to the standard media and to LA in detection after enrichment and also in enumeration, except in the case of fresh broiler cut samples. The overall sensitivities of the Palcam, Oxford, LA and LMBA media were 68%, 67%, 74% and 96% in detection after enrichment and 64%, 73%, 76% and 80% in the enumeration of the species from ready to eat foods. The superiority of LMBA is based on distinguishing L. monocytogenes from other Listeria species by detection of beta-hemolysis, whereas the other media gave false-negative results because of the overgrowth of Listeria spp. other than L. monocytogenes, especially in detection after enrichment. A more selective medium than LMBA would have been required for the enumeration of the species from samples with high levels of competitive bacteria other than Listeria spp. The results indicate the need for a more specific isolation medium for L. monocytogenes in addition to those recommended by ISO and IDF for both detection and enumeration. LMBA offers an alternative to be used in combination with either Palcam or Oxford as well as with LA.
将产单核细胞李斯特菌血琼脂(LMBA)与基于氯化锂和头孢他啶的李斯特菌选择性琼脂(LA)以及ISO和国际乳品联合会(IDF)推荐用于从食品和食品加工环境中检测和计数产单核细胞李斯特菌的牛津培养基和帕尔卡姆培养基进行了比较。LMBA基于胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂,并添加了以下成分:羊血(5%)以及作为选择性试剂的氯化锂(10 g/l)、硫酸多粘菌素B(10 mg/l)和头孢他啶(20 mg/l),而LA的选择性基于氯化锂(15 g/l)和头孢他啶(15 g/l)。对这些培养基在从天然污染的食品(n = 423)和食品加工环境(n = 93)中富集后检测产单核细胞李斯特菌以及在对天然污染的食品(n = 287)中的该菌进行计数方面进行了比较。除了新鲜肉鸡切块样本外,LMBA在富集后检测以及计数方面均优于标准培养基和LA。帕尔卡姆、牛津、LA和LMBA培养基在富集后检测中的总体灵敏度分别为68%、67%、74%和96%,在即食食品中该菌计数时的总体灵敏度分别为64%、73%、76%和80%。LMBA的优势在于通过检测β溶血来区分产单核细胞李斯特菌与其他李斯特菌属菌种,而其他培养基由于产单核细胞李斯特菌以外的李斯特菌属菌种过度生长而给出假阴性结果,尤其是在富集后检测中。对于从含有高水平非李斯特菌属竞争性细菌的样本中计数该菌种,需要一种比LMBA更具选择性的培养基。结果表明,除了ISO和IDF推荐的用于检测和计数的培养基外,还需要一种更特异的产单核细胞李斯特菌分离培养基。LMBA可作为一种替代培养基,与帕尔卡姆或牛津培养基以及LA联合使用。