Van Natta T L, Morris J A, Eddy V A, Nunn C R, Rutherford E J, Neuzil D, Jenkins J M, Bass J G
Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA.
Ann Surg. 1998 May;227(5):618-24; discussion 624-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00002.
The success of elective minimally invasive surgery suggested that this concept could be adapted to the intensive care unit. We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery could be done safely and cost-effectively at the bedside in critically injured patients.
This case series, conducted between October 1991 and June 1997 at a Level I trauma center, examined bedside dilatational tracheostomy (BDT), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement. All procedures had been performed in the operating room (OR) before initiation of this study.
All BDTs and PEGs were performed with intravenous general anesthesia (fentanyl, diazepam, and pancuronium) administered by the surgical team. IVC filters were placed using local anesthesia and conscious sedation. BDTs were done using a Ciaglia set, PEGs were done using a 20 Fr Flexiflow Inverta-PEG kit, and IVC filters were placed percutaneously under ultrasound guidance. Cost difference (delta cost) was defined as the difference in hospital cost and physician charges incurred in the OR as compared to the bedside.
Of 16,417 trauma admissions, 379 patients (2%) underwent 472 minimally invasive procedures (272 BDTs, 129 PEGs, 71 IVC filters). There were four major complications (0.8%). Two patients had loss of airway requiring reintubation. Two patients had an intraperitoneal leak from the gastrostomy requiring operative repair. No patient had a major complication after IVC filter placement. Total delta cost was $611,994. When examined independently, the cost was $324,224 for BDT, $164,088 for PEG, and $123,682 for IVC filter. OR use was reduced by 506 hours.
These bedside procedures have minimal complications, eliminate the risk associated with patient transport, reduce cost, improve OR utilization, and should be considered for routine use in the general surgery population.
择期微创手术的成功表明这一概念可应用于重症监护病房。我们推测在危重伤员床边进行微创手术既安全又具有成本效益。
本病例系列研究于1991年10月至1997年6月在一级创伤中心进行,观察了床边扩张气管切开术(BDT)、经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)和下腔静脉(IVC)滤器置入术。在本研究开始前,所有这些操作均在手术室(OR)进行。
所有BDT和PEG手术均由手术团队给予静脉全身麻醉(芬太尼、地西泮和潘库溴铵)。IVC滤器置入采用局部麻醉和清醒镇静。BDT使用Ciaglia套件进行,PEG使用20Fr Flexiflow Inverta - PEG套件进行,IVC滤器在超声引导下经皮置入。成本差异(成本增量)定义为与床边操作相比,手术室的医院成本和医生收费的差异。
在16417例创伤入院患者中,379例(2%)接受了472例微创手术(272例BDT、129例PEG、71例IVC滤器)。发生了4例主要并发症(0.8%)。2例患者气道丧失需要重新插管。2例患者胃造口处发生腹腔内渗漏需要手术修复。IVC滤器置入后无患者发生主要并发症。总成本增量为611994美元。单独检查时,BDT成本为324224美元,PEG成本为164088美元,IVC滤器成本为123682美元。手术室使用时间减少了506小时。
这些床边操作并发症极少,消除了与患者转运相关的风险,降低了成本,提高了手术室利用率,应考虑在普通外科患者中常规使用。