Suppr超能文献

识别与列表辨别中的提取动态:熟悉度与回忆的分离过程的进一步证据。

Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.

作者信息

Hintzman D L, Caulton D A, Levitin D J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1998 May;26(3):449-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03201155.

Abstract

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that the time course of retrieval from memory is different for familiarity and recall. The response-signal method was used to compare memory retrieval dynamics in yes-no recognition memory, as a measure of familiarity, with those of list discrimination, as a measure of contextual recall. Responses were always made with regard to membership in two previous study lists. In Experiment 1 an exclusion task requiring positive responses to words from one list and negative responses to new words and words from the nontarget list was used. In Experiment 2, recognition and list discrimination were separate tasks. Retrieval curves from both experiments were consistent, showing that the minimal retrieval time for recognition was about 100 msec faster than that for list discrimination. Repetition affected asymptotic performance but had no reliable effects on retrieval dynamics in either the recognition or the list-discrimination task.

摘要

两项实验对以下假设进行了检验

记忆提取的时间进程在熟悉度和回忆方面存在差异。采用反应信号法,将是/否识别记忆中的记忆提取动态(作为熟悉度的一种度量)与列表辨别中的记忆提取动态(作为情境回忆的一种度量)进行比较。反应总是针对之前两个学习列表中的成员资格做出。在实验1中,使用了一项排除任务,要求对来自一个列表的单词做出肯定反应,对新单词和来自非目标列表的单词做出否定反应。在实验2中,识别和列表辨别是分开的任务。两个实验的提取曲线是一致的,表明识别的最短提取时间比列表辨别快约100毫秒。重复影响渐近表现,但对识别任务或列表辨别任务中的提取动态均无可靠影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验