Huikuri H V, Mäkikallio T H, Airaksinen K E, Seppänen T, Puukka P, Räihä I J, Sourander L B
Department of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland.
Circulation. 1998 May 26;97(20):2031-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.20.2031.
The prognostic role of heart rate (HR) variability analyzed from 24-hour ECG recordings in the general population is not well known. We studied whether analysis of 24-hour HR behavior is able to predict mortality in a random population of elderly subjects.
A random sample of 347 subjects of > or =65 years of age (mean, 73+/-6 years) underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and 24-hour ECG recordings and were subsequently followed up for 10 years. Various spectral and nonspectral measures of HR variability were analyzed from the baseline 24-hour ECG recordings. Risk factors for all-cause, cardiac, cerebrovascular, cancer, and other causes of death were assessed. By the end of 10-year follow-up, 184 subjects (53%) had died and 163 (47%) were still alive. Seventy-four subjects (21%) had died of cardiac disease, 37 of cancer (11%), 25 of cerebrovascular disease (7%), and 48 (14%) of various other causes. Among all analyzed variables, a steep slope of the power-law regression line of HR variability (< -1.50) was the best univariate predictor of all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7 to 17.0; P<.0001). After adjusting for age and sex and including all univariate predictors of mortality in the proportional hazards analysis, ie, measures of HR variability, history of heart disease, functional class, smoking, medication, and blood cholesterol and glucose concentrations, all-cause mortality was predicted only by the slope of HR variability (adjusted relative risk, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.13; P<.0001) and a history of congestive heart failure (adjusted relative risk, 1.70; P=.0002). The slope of HR variability predicted both cardiac (adjusted relative risk, 2.05; P=.0002) and cerebrovascular death (adjusted relative risk, 2.84; P=.0001) but not cancer or other causes of death.
Power-law relationship of 24-hour HR variability is a more powerful predictor of death than the traditional risk markers in elderly subjects. Altered long-term behavior of HR implies an increased risk of vascular causes of death rather than being a marker of any disease or frailty leading to death.
在普通人群中,通过24小时心电图记录分析心率(HR)变异性的预后作用尚不明确。我们研究了分析24小时心率行为是否能够预测老年随机人群的死亡率。
对347名年龄≥65岁(平均年龄73±6岁)的受试者进行随机抽样,进行全面的临床评估、实验室检查和24小时心电图记录,随后进行10年随访。从基线24小时心电图记录中分析心率变异性的各种频谱和非频谱指标。评估全因、心脏、脑血管、癌症及其他死因的危险因素。到10年随访结束时,184名受试者(53%)死亡,163名(47%)仍存活。74名受试者(21%)死于心脏病,37名死于癌症(11%),25名死于脑血管疾病(7%),48名(14%)死于各种其他原因。在所有分析变量中,心率变异性的幂律回归线斜率陡峭(<-1.50)是全因死亡率的最佳单变量预测指标(比值比,7.9;95%置信区间[CI],3.7至17.0;P<0.0001)。在按年龄和性别进行调整并将所有死亡率的单变量预测指标纳入比例风险分析后,即心率变异性指标、心脏病史、功能分级、吸烟、用药情况以及血液胆固醇和葡萄糖浓度,全因死亡率仅由心率变异性斜率(调整后相对风险,1.74;95%CI,1.42至2.13;P<0.0001)和充血性心力衰竭病史(调整后相对风险,1.70;P=0.0002)预测。心率变异性斜率可预测心脏死亡(调整后相对风险,2.05;P=0.0002)和脑血管死亡(调整后相对风险,2.84;P=0.0001),但不能预测癌症或其他死因。
在老年受试者中,24小时心率变异性的幂律关系比传统风险标志物更能有力地预测死亡。心率长期行为的改变意味着血管性死因风险增加,而非导致死亡的任何疾病或虚弱的标志物。