Kahn H S, Tatham L M, Thun M J, Heath C W
Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30329-4251, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 May;13(5):303-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00095.x.
Investigate risk factors for colon polyp using multivariate analyses.
In a group responding to a 1992 mail survey, we assessed the association between physician-diagnosed colon polyp and possible risk factors reported primarily 10 years earlier.
Survey respondents within the Cancer Prevention Study II.
Respondents, 72,868 men and 81,356 women, who reported no polyp diagnosis when questioned in 1982 at ages 40 to 64 years.
The characteristics of 7,504 men (10.3%) and 5,111 women (6.3%) reporting a first colon polyp were compared with those of participants who did not report a polyp. After adjustments for age, family history of colorectal cancer, and other potential risk factors, polyp occurrence was associated with 1982 histories of smoking, former smoking, alcohol use of at least two drinks per day (odds ratios [ORs] from 1.5 to 1.1; all p < .005), and a body mass index > or = 28 kg/m2 (men's OR 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00, 1.13; women's OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99, 1.17). Polyps were also associated with a diagnosis of gallbladder disease or gallstone at any time and with gallbladder surgery up to 1982 (OR from 2.7 to 1.3; all p < .001). Polyp occurrence was inversely associated with 1982 histories of high exercise level (men's OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76, 0.91; women's OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.78, 1.03), frequent aspirin use in women (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.77, 0.95), and high parity in women (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75, 0.94). Among participants lacking a clinically normal gallbladder, the polyp risks associated with smoking and high body mass index were reduced (p < .04 for interactions).
Despite the limitations and potential biases in these self-reported data, the risk factors described here may be useful for identifying persons at modestly increased risk of having a colon polyp. The effect-modifying role of gallbladder status deserves further investigation.
采用多变量分析方法研究结肠息肉的危险因素。
在一组对1992年邮件调查做出回应的人群中,我们评估了医生诊断的结肠息肉与主要在10年前报告的可能危险因素之间的关联。
癌症预防研究II的调查对象。
72868名男性和81356名女性,他们在1982年40至64岁接受询问时报告无息肉诊断。
将报告首次出现结肠息肉的7504名男性(10.3%)和5111名女性(6.3%)的特征与未报告有息肉的参与者进行比较。在对年龄、结直肠癌家族史及其他潜在危险因素进行调整后,息肉的发生与1982年的吸烟史、既往吸烟史、每日至少饮用两杯酒(比值比[ORs]为1.5至1.1;均p < 0.005)以及体重指数>或 = 28 kg/m²相关(男性OR 1.06;95%置信区间[CI] 1.00, 1.13;女性OR 1.08;95% CI 0.99, 1.17)。息肉还与任何时候诊断为胆囊疾病或胆结石以及截至1982年的胆囊手术相关(OR为2.7至1.3;均p < 0.001)。息肉的发生与1982年的高运动水平史呈负相关(男性OR 0.83;95% CI 0.76, 0.91;女性OR 0.90;95% CI 0.78, 1.03),女性经常使用阿司匹林(OR 0.85;95% CI 0.77, 0.95)以及女性高生育次数(OR 0.84;95% CI 0.75, 0.94)。在缺乏临床正常胆囊的参与者中,与吸烟和高体重指数相关的息肉风险降低(交互作用p < 0.04)。
尽管这些自我报告数据存在局限性和潜在偏差,但此处描述的危险因素可能有助于识别患结肠息肉风险适度增加的人群。胆囊状态的效应修饰作用值得进一步研究。