Thompson S A, Dummer P M
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
J Endod. 1998 Feb;24(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80094-0.
The aim of this study was to determine the shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated canals. Forty simulated root canals made up of four different shapes in terms of angle and position of curvature were prepared by both sets of instruments using a stepdown approach. This study describes the efficacy of the instruments in terms of prevalence of canal aberrations, the amount and direction of canal transportation, and thus the overall postoperative shape. Pre- and postoperative images of the canals were taken using a videocamera attached to a computer with image analysis software. The pre- and postoperative views were superimposed to highlight the amount and position of material removed during preparation. Neither Mity Roto 360 degrees nor Naviflex instruments created any zips or elbows. Ledges were produced in 20 (50%) canals prepared with Mity instruments and in 29 (72%) canals prepared with Naviflex instruments. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between canal shapes occurred in relation to the incidence of ledges with 40 degrees canals (35) associated with more aberrations than 20 degrees canals (14); the position of the beginning of the curve had no effect. The distance of ledges from the end point of preparation was also affected significantly (p < 0.01) by canal shape. Neither instrument created any perforations or danger zones. At specific positions along the canal length, canal shape had a significant influence on total width and the amount of material removed from the inner and outer aspects of the canal curve. The direction of canal transportation at the end point of preparation was most frequently toward the outer aspect of the curve in canals prepared with Naviflex instruments, whereas the Mity instruments produced a more balanced preparation. At the apex and beginning of the curve, transportation with both instruments was generally toward the outer aspect of the curve. Overall, mean absolute transportation was small and was below 0.1 mm at every position except the orifice. Under the conditions of this study, Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary instruments prepared canals with a high incidence of ledges. However, in the absence of other aberrations, both instruments would seem to be a valuable addition to the endodontic armamentarium.
本研究的目的是确定Mity Roto 360度镍钛旋转器械和Naviflex镍钛旋转器械在模拟根管中的塑形能力。使用逐步深入法,两组器械分别预备了40个模拟根管,这些根管在弯曲角度和位置方面有四种不同形状。本研究从根管形态异常的发生率、根管偏移的量和方向以及术后总体形态方面描述了器械的有效性。使用连接有图像分析软件的计算机的摄像机拍摄根管的术前和术后图像。将术前和术后视图叠加,以突出预备过程中去除材料的量和位置。Mity Roto 360度器械和Naviflex器械均未造成任何根管壁穿孔或肘部形成。使用Mity器械预备的20个(50%)根管和使用Naviflex器械预备的29个(72%)根管出现了台阶。在台阶发生率方面,根管形状之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001),40度弯曲的根管(3个台阶发生率(35个)高于20度弯曲的根管(14个);弯曲起始位置对此没有影响。台阶距预备终点的距离也受到根管形状的显著影响(p < 0.01)。两种器械均未造成任何穿孔或危险区域。在根管长度的特定位置,根管形状对根管总宽度以及从根管弯曲内、外侧去除材料的量有显著影响。在使用Naviflex器械预备的根管中,预备终点处根管偏移方向最常见的是朝向弯曲外侧,而Mity器械预备的更为均衡。在弯曲的根尖和起始处,两种器械造成的偏移通常朝向弯曲外侧。总体而言,平均绝对偏移量较小,除根管口外,每个位置均低于0.1 mm。在本研究条件下,Mity Roto 360度器械和Naviflex镍钛旋转器械预备根管时台阶发生率较高。然而,在没有其他形态异常的情况下,这两种器械似乎都是牙髓治疗器械库中有价值的补充。