Burton A K, Waddell G
Spinal Research Unit, University of Huddersfield, UK.
Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1998 Feb;12(1):17-35. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(98)80004-6.
With the emergent concept of evidence-based practice, various countries have produced clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain since 1993-94. By and large the evidence-base for these proposals is consistent, though over the last 4 years it has increased considerably, and there has been a slight change of emphasis in several aspects. As all the guidelines are based on the same evidence, the similarity between them is not surprising. The common features are diagnostic triage along with periodic assessment to guide management strategies. There has been progressive reduction in the recommendation of rest as a treatment option, and early activation is increasingly recognized as a potent intervention. There has been a progressive recognition that psychosocial factors are important determinants for the risk of chronicity, and that such factors need to be addressed clinically. Specific therapeutic recommendations vary, but these are probably less important than the overall strategy. It is obviously hoped that clinical management should improve as a result of these initiatives, but effective dissemination and implementation are persisting concerns, and the effectiveness of clinical guidelines in changing clinical practice is still unproven.
随着循证医学实践这一新兴概念的出现,自1993 - 1994年以来,各国纷纷制定了急性下腰痛管理的临床指南。总体而言,这些建议的证据基础是一致的,不过在过去4年里有了显著增加,并且在几个方面的重点略有变化。由于所有指南都基于相同的证据,它们之间的相似性也就不足为奇了。共同特点是进行诊断分类以及定期评估,以指导管理策略。作为一种治疗选择,休息的推荐逐渐减少,早期活动越来越被视为一种有效的干预措施。人们逐渐认识到社会心理因素是慢性化风险的重要决定因素,并且需要在临床上加以处理。具体的治疗建议各不相同,但这些可能不如总体策略重要。显然希望这些举措能改善临床管理,但有效的传播和实施仍然是持续关注的问题,临床指南在改变临床实践方面的有效性仍未得到证实。