Suppr超能文献

叩击排痰和体位引流的替代方法。黏液清除疗法综述:叩击排痰和体位引流、自主引流、呼气末正压、振荡呼气阀、肺内叩击通气以及使用ThAIRapy Vest进行高频胸部按压。

Alternatives to percussion and postural drainage. A review of mucus clearance therapies: percussion and postural drainage, autogenic drainage, positive expiratory pressure, flutter valve, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and high-frequency chest compression with the ThAIRapy Vest.

作者信息

Langenderfer B

机构信息

Respiratory Care Program, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights 41099, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1998 Jul-Aug;18(4):283-9. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199807000-00005.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review published studies on the efficacy of old and new mucus clearance techniques and to develop recommendations for different groups of patients. Mucus clearance is a problem in cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and many other pulmonary conditions. Percussion and postural drainage (P & PD) was the traditional method of facilitating mucus clearance, but the many hazards and contraindications along with the onerous nature and resultant poor patient compliance of this procedure have led to the development of alternative therapies. Research studies with cystic fibrosis patients support the efficacy of P & PD in patients who can tolerate it. However, equivalent sputum production can be accomplished with autogenic drainage, positive expiratory pressure, and Flutter valve therapy without the assistance of another caregiver, as long as the patient has the motivation, breath control, and neuromuscular function to perform these modalities. The Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation device and high-frequency chest compression with the ThAIRapy vest involve more elaborate and expensive equipment, yet these devices provide mucus clearance assistance to patients who lack the ability to perform the simpler techniques. Both mechanized modalities promote independence and self-care in the patient, and the effectiveness of both has been supported by the limited research published to date. Which alternative to recommend depends on the ability, motivation, preference, needs, and resources of each patient.

摘要

本文旨在回顾已发表的关于新旧黏液清除技术疗效的研究,并为不同患者群体制定建议。黏液清除是囊性纤维化、支气管扩张症及许多其他肺部疾病中的一个问题。叩击和体位引流(P&PD)是促进黏液清除的传统方法,但该操作存在诸多风险和禁忌证,加之其操作繁琐且患者依从性差,导致了替代疗法的发展。针对囊性纤维化患者的研究表明,P&PD对能够耐受的患者有效。然而,只要患者有动力、具备呼吸控制能力和神经肌肉功能来进行这些操作,通过自主引流、呼气末正压通气和弗勒特瓣膜治疗,无需他人协助就能达到同等的痰液排出量。肺内叩击通气装置和使用ThAIRapy背心进行高频胸部按压涉及更复杂、更昂贵的设备,但这些设备能为无法进行更简单操作的患者提供黏液清除帮助。这两种机械方式都能促进患者的独立性和自我护理能力,且迄今为止发表的有限研究均支持了二者的有效性。推荐哪种替代方法取决于每位患者的能力、动力、偏好、需求和资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验