Gerich T G, Schmidt U, Hubrich V, Lobenhoffer H P, Tscherne H
Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
J Trauma. 1998 Aug;45(2):312-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199808000-00017.
Ensuring an unobstructed airway and adequate oxygenation are first priorities in the resuscitation of the trauma patient. In situations of difficult endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence protocols frequently include the use of paralytic agents and cricothyrotomy for airway management. Recent literature findings suggest that the prehospital use of cricothyrotomy is too frequent. The purpose of this study was (a) to evaluate the efficacy of a rapid sequence intubation protocol without the use of paralytic agents, and (b) to determine the need for cricothyrotomy by using this protocol in the field.
We prospectively analyzed 383 acutely injured patients who were in need of airway control. Success rates, indications, and complications of endotracheal intubation and cricothyrotomy were analyzed.
Successful orotracheal intubation on the scene with the use of this protocol was performed in 373 of 383 patients (97%). Two patients (0.5%) arrived at the trauma center with unrecognized esophageal intubation. Eight patients underwent cricothyrotomy in the field, six without previous attempts at intubation.
Experienced emergency medical services personnel can effectively perform endotracheal intubation with narcotic analgesics without the use of paralytic agents in the field. With proper training for field airway management, cricothyrotomy in the field can be reduced to a few indications with high success rates.
确保气道通畅和充分氧合是创伤患者复苏的首要任务。在气管插管困难的情况下,快速顺序诱导方案通常包括使用麻痹剂和环甲膜切开术来进行气道管理。最近的文献研究结果表明,院前环甲膜切开术的使用过于频繁。本研究的目的是:(a)评估不使用麻痹剂的快速顺序诱导方案的有效性;(b)通过在现场使用该方案来确定环甲膜切开术的必要性。
我们前瞻性分析了383例需要气道控制的急性受伤患者。分析了气管插管和环甲膜切开术的成功率、适应证及并发症。
采用该方案在现场成功进行经口气管插管的患者有373例(97%),占383例患者中的比例。2例患者(0.5%)到达创伤中心时存在未被识别的食管插管情况。8例患者在现场接受了环甲膜切开术,其中6例此前未尝试过插管。
经验丰富的急救医疗服务人员在现场不使用麻痹剂,仅使用麻醉性镇痛药就能有效进行气管插管。通过对现场气道管理进行适当培训,现场环甲膜切开术的适应证可减少至少数几种,且成功率较高。