Suppr超能文献

对美国陆军士兵关于预防节肢动物相关疾病和蚊虫叮咬的个人防护措施的知识、态度和行为的调查。

Survey of U.S. Army soldiers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding personal protection measures to prevent arthropod-related diseases and nuisance bites.

作者信息

Gambel J M, Brundage J F, Burge R J, DeFraites R F, Smoak B L, Wirtz R A

机构信息

Division of Preventive Medicine, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC 20307-5100, USA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 1998 Oct;163(10):695-701.

PMID:9795547
Abstract

This study examined U.S. Army soldiers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding personal protection measures (PPMs) to prevent arthropod-related diseases and nuisance bites. Soldiers attending 1 of 13 U.S. Army training courses either completed a written questionnaire (N = 1,007) or participated in a group interview (N = 65). Respondents primarily used repellents to prevent nuisance insect bites (55%) rather than to prevent disease (38.7%). Less than one-third correctly identified the military-issue repellents to be used on skin (31.7%) or clothing (26.1%). More than half (57.6%) thought that commercial products were better than military-issue repellents, but most (74.2%) reported that they did not have enough or any information about the U.S. military's system of PPMs. Soldiers have poor knowledge of U.S. military doctrine regarding PPMs and still prefer to use commercial products. A focused strategy to ensure the appropriate use of PPMs by service members should be developed, implemented, and evaluated.

摘要

本研究调查了美国陆军士兵在预防节肢动物相关疾病和烦扰性叮咬的个人防护措施(PPMs)方面的知识、态度和做法。参加13门美国陆军培训课程之一的士兵要么完成一份书面问卷(N = 1007),要么参加小组访谈(N = 65)。受访者主要使用驱虫剂来预防烦扰性昆虫叮咬(55%),而非预防疾病(38.7%)。不到三分之一的人正确识别出可用于皮肤(31.7%)或衣物(26.1%)的军队配发驱虫剂。超过一半(57.6%)的人认为商业产品比军队配发的驱虫剂更好,但大多数人(74.2%)表示他们没有足够的或任何关于美国军队PPMs系统的信息。士兵对美国军队关于PPMs的条令了解不足,并且仍然更喜欢使用商业产品。应制定、实施和评估一项重点战略,以确保军人正确使用PPMs。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验