Lofstrom T, Anderson J S, Kruse A
Synoptik Contact Lens R&D Clinic, Copenhagen, Denmark.
CLAO J. 1998 Oct;24(4):210-5.
The 5-stage scale currently used to grade tarsal conjunctiva is limited with respect to precisely describing the tissue condition and accurately following small changes. We conducted two preliminary studies to evaluate a new 8-stage, photographic tarsal conjunctival grading system.
We conducted a retrospective review of the records of 145 individuals in Denmark who had successfully worn Acuvue lenses for at least six months on a daily wear basis. Patients wore Acuvue lenses on a two-week replacement schedule and used one of four different care systems (AOSEPT, OPTI-FREE, OXYSEPT, and RENU). Tarsal conjunctiva and lens cleanliness were graded by the investigators. Comfort, vision, and simplicity of care system were rated by the patients. In the second, prospective study, a group of 30 patients who had successfully worn Acuvue lenses and used the OPTI-FREE care system for at least six months were followed for three months to test the repeatability of the new grading system.
In the first study, patients using RENU were found to have significantly higher scores than AOSEPT and OPTI-FREE patients when comparing tarsal scores based on the 5-stage scale (P < 0.05). When comparing scores based on the 8-stage scale, significant differences were detected between RENU and all three of the other care systems, with RENU scores being higher (P < 0.05). Numerous differences were found among care systems in lens cleanliness and subjective patient ratings of comfort, vision, and simplicity of use. In the second study, tarsal scores did not change over time in the patients followed for three months.
These initial studies suggest that the new grading scale may allow for more precise determination of the condition of the tarsal conjunctiva and provide for a greater ability to detect differences among lens care regimens in tarsal conjunctival scores. Early indications are that the scale is reliable and repeatable.
目前用于睑结膜分级的5级量表在精确描述组织状况和准确跟踪微小变化方面存在局限性。我们进行了两项初步研究,以评估一种新的8级睑结膜摄影分级系统。
我们对丹麦145名每天佩戴Acuvue镜片至少6个月且佩戴成功的个体的记录进行了回顾性研究。患者按照两周更换一次的时间表佩戴Acuvue镜片,并使用四种不同护理系统(AOSEPT、OPTI-FREE、OXYSEPT和RENU)中的一种。研究人员对睑结膜和镜片清洁度进行分级。患者对护理系统的舒适度、视力和简易程度进行评分。在第二项前瞻性研究中,对一组成功佩戴Acuvue镜片并使用OPTI-FREE护理系统至少6个月的30名患者进行了为期3个月的随访,以测试新分级系统的可重复性。
在第一项研究中,基于5级量表比较睑结膜评分时,发现使用RENU的患者得分显著高于使用AOSEPT和OPTI-FREE的患者(P<0.05)。基于8级量表比较得分时,发现RENU与其他三种护理系统之间均存在显著差异,RENU得分更高(P<0.05)。在护理系统之间,镜片清洁度以及患者对舒适度、视力和使用简易程度的主观评分存在诸多差异。在第二项研究中,随访3个月的患者睑结膜评分未随时间变化。
这些初步研究表明,新的分级量表可能有助于更精确地确定睑结膜状况,并更有能力检测不同镜片护理方案在睑结膜评分上的差异。早期迹象表明该量表可靠且可重复。