Cairns M J, Murray V
School of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1998 Oct;46(2):267-75. doi: 10.1080/15216549800203782.
The DNA sequence specificity of hedamycin damage was compared using two techniques: Ligation-mediated PCR (LMPCR) and Linear Amplification (LA). The electrophoretic mobility of LA products were made comparable with LMPCR products by using a primer with a 27 bp non-binding 5'-extension. By direct comparison of the damage intensity (as represented by each of the methods), considerable bias was found in the LMPCR system with respect to LA--resulting in the under representation of lesions with T as the base 3' to the damage site. In view of this observation some caution should be exercised in the interpretation of data for DNA damage/repair specificity derived by LMPCR. In addition the extended primer LA method used in these experiments, could be applied to generate a dideoxy sequencing ladder for analysis of LMPCR products. This would negate the need to prepare Maxam-Gilbert chemical sequencing fragments for amplification through LMPCR.
使用两种技术比较了赫达霉素损伤的DNA序列特异性:连接介导的PCR(LMPCR)和线性扩增(LA)。通过使用具有27 bp非结合5'-延伸的引物,使LA产物的电泳迁移率与LMPCR产物相当。通过直接比较损伤强度(由每种方法表示),发现LMPCR系统相对于LA存在相当大的偏差,导致损伤位点3'端以T为碱基的损伤表现不足。鉴于这一观察结果,在解释通过LMPCR获得的DNA损伤/修复特异性数据时应谨慎。此外,这些实验中使用的扩展引物LA方法可用于生成双脱氧测序梯,以分析LMPCR产物。这将消除制备通过LMPCR扩增的Maxam-Gilbert化学测序片段的需要。