Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Kiel, Germany.
Hum Reprod. 1998 Oct;13(1O):2748-50. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2748.
The aim of the study was a comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. Utilizing robotic technology a robot has been designed specifically for the purpose of holding and manoeuvring the laparoscope under the direct control of the surgeon. We tested AESOP (automated endoscopic system for optimal positioning) in 50 patients undergoing routine gynaecological endoscopic surgical procedures. The elimination of the camera holder allows two doctors to perform complex laparoscopic surgery faster than without the robotic arm. The timing of surgical procedures performed by surgeons using the voice control was compared to the timing of similar operations using the foot or hand control. The voice-controlled AESOP works more efficiently and faster than the hand or foot control.
该研究的目的是比较机器人辅助与人工腹腔镜摄像头控制。利用机器人技术,专门设计了一种机器人,用于在外科医生的直接控制下握持和操作腹腔镜。我们在50例接受常规妇科内镜手术的患者中测试了AESOP(自动内镜最佳定位系统)。省去持镜员后,两名医生进行复杂腹腔镜手术的速度比没有机器人手臂时更快。将使用语音控制的外科医生进行手术的时间与使用脚控或手控进行类似手术的时间进行了比较。语音控制的AESOP比手控或脚控工作效率更高、速度更快。