Møiniche S, Mikkelsen S, Wetterslev J, Dahl J B
Department of Anaesthesiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Sep;81(3):377-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.3.377.
In a qualitative systematic review, we have evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCT) of incisional local anaesthesia compared with placebo or no treatment in the control of postoperative pain after open abdominal operations. Twenty-six studies with data from 1211 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. Five RCT considered inguinal herniotomy, four hysterectomy, eight cholecystectomy and nine studies a variety of surgical procedures. Outcome measures were pain scores, supplementary analgesics and time to first analgesic request. Efficacy was estimated by significant difference (P < 0.05), as reported in the original investigation. All studies of herniotomy showed a 2-7-h duration of clinically relevant improved pain relief. Results of hysterectomy studies were inconclusive, with two being negative. Five of the cholecystectomy studies showed significant differences but questionable clinical importance and validity in three. In various other procedures results were inconsistent and in some of minor clinical importance. Except for herniotomy, there was a lack of evidence for effect of incisional local anaesthesia on postoperative pain and further standardized studies are needed before recommendations can be made.
在一项定性系统评价中,我们评估了开放性腹部手术后,切口局部麻醉与安慰剂或不治疗相比,在控制术后疼痛方面的随机对照试验(RCT)。26项研究的数据来自1211名患者,被认为适合进行分析。5项RCT涉及腹股沟疝修补术,4项涉及子宫切除术,8项涉及胆囊切除术,9项涉及各种外科手术。结局指标为疼痛评分、辅助镇痛药及首次要求使用镇痛药的时间。疗效根据原始研究报告中的显著差异(P<0.05)进行评估。所有疝修补术研究均显示,临床相关的疼痛缓解改善持续时间为2至7小时。子宫切除术研究结果尚无定论,其中两项为阴性。胆囊切除术研究中有五项显示出显著差异,但三项的临床重要性和有效性存疑。在其他各种手术中,结果不一致,部分临床重要性较小。除疝修补术外,缺乏证据表明切口局部麻醉对术后疼痛有影响,在提出建议之前,需要进一步进行标准化研究。