Suppr超能文献

绵羊1型促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子受体(CRF1)及其羧基末端变体的结构与功能

Structure and function of the ovine type 1 corticotropin releasing factor receptor (CRF1) and a carboxyl-terminal variant.

作者信息

Myers D A, Trinh J V, Myers T R

机构信息

Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190, USA.

出版信息

Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998 Sep 25;144(1-2):21-35. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(98)00157-9.

Abstract

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) is the major neuropeptide regulating the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in most species. A pituitary receptor for CRF (designated CRF1) belonging to the seven-transmembrane helix, G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily has been cloned for human, rat, mouse and xenopus. Since ovine CRF shares only 84% identity to human/rat CRF (h/rCRF) we postulated that the sheep pituitary CRF1 receptor may have similarly diverged from the rodent and human CRF1. We report the molecular cloning of an ovine pituitary cDNA containing a 1245 bp open reading frame encoding a 415 amino acid sheep CRF1 receptor 78, 86, 94, and 95% homologous to xenopus, chicken, rat, mouse, and human CRF1, respectively. The divergence in primary structure between the sheep CRF1 and the other mammalian CRF1s is primarily localized to the extracellular amino terminal domain of the receptor (18 of 22 divergent residues, ovine vs human CRF1). A variant of the oCRF1 was also isolated (oCRF1var) with 133 bp deleted from nucleotide (nt) 1080 to nt 1213 of the open reading frame (ORF) resulting in a new ORF of 1176 nt predicting a 392 residue CRF1 variant receptor. The 133 bp deletion would cause a frame-shift at residue 358 within the carboxyl-third of the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7) resulting in a shortened cytoplasmic tail with a new amino acid sequence from residue 358 to 392. Scatchard analysis of saturation curves using membrane prepared from Cos 7 cells transfected with oCRF1 or oCRF1var indicated that both wild-type and variant receptors were expressed similarly (number of CRF binding sites) and both bound oCRF with high affinity [oCRF1 (Kd): 2.5 + 1.6 nM; oCRF1var: 5.1 + 2.3 nM]. The non-hydrolyzable GTP analogue (GTPgammaS) lowered the affinity of both wild-type and variant oCRF1 receptors to a similar extent (oCRF1: 18.2 nM; oCRF1var: 22.4 nM). Both wild-type and variant oCRF1 receptors exhibited approximately 10-fold greater selectivity for oCRF and sauvagine compared to h/rCRF or alpha-helical [9-41]oCRF. CRF effectively stimulated the accumulation of cAMP (EC50 = 51 pM) in Cos 7 cells transiently transfected with wild-type but not variant oCRF1 receptor. In Cos 7 cells transfected with oCRF1var, cAMP accumulation was only observed at the highest concentration of oCRF utilized (100 nM). Basal (unstimulated) levels of cAMP in Cos 7 cells transfected with oCRF1var (in the presence of 2 mM IBMX) were approximately 50% lower than for the wild-type oCRF1. Differences in cAMP accumulation could not be attributed to differences in receptor number since total binding sites in the transfected cells were not different between wild-type or variant oCRF1 receptors. Agonist-induced receptor internalization, determined as the percent of total [125I] Tyr0-oCRF bound located in the acid-resistant fraction of transfected Cos 7 cells, increased with time (0-60 min at 37 degrees C) for both wild-type and variant oCRF1. Wild-type CRF1 internalized approximately 2-fold greater percent of total [125I] Tyr0-oCRF bound compared to the variant receptor. In summary, an ovine CRF1 and a CRF1 cytoplasmic tail receptor variant displaying high affinity binding to oCRF as well as selectivity for oCRF vs h/rCRF, were cloned from an adult sheep pituitary cDNA library. GTPgammaS studies indicate that both variant and wild-type receptors couple efficiently to Galphas however, only the wild-type oCRF1 is capable of stimulating cAMP production at physiological levels of CRF. Agonist-induced internalization of the ovine CRF1var is also reduced compared to the wild-type CRF1 receptor. We suggest that the oCRF1var interacts efficiently with Galphas but is unable (post-hormonal binding) to effectively stimulate G-protein activation of adenylate cyclase, indicating that the cytoplasmic tail of the CRF1 can modulate receptor function related to signal transduction. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)是大多数物种中调节下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺皮质轴的主要神经肽。已克隆出人类、大鼠、小鼠和非洲爪蟾的CRF垂体受体(命名为CRF1),它属于七跨膜螺旋、G蛋白偶联受体超家族。由于绵羊CRF与人类/大鼠CRF(h/rCRF)仅有84%的同源性,我们推测绵羊垂体CRF1受体可能与啮齿动物和人类的CRF1有类似的差异。我们报道了从成年绵羊垂体cDNA文库中克隆出一个绵羊垂体cDNA,其开放阅读框为1245 bp,编码一个415个氨基酸的绵羊CRF1受体,该受体分别与非洲爪蟾、鸡、大鼠、小鼠和人类的CRF1有78%、86%、94%和95%的同源性。绵羊CRF1与其他哺乳动物CRF1在一级结构上的差异主要位于受体的细胞外氨基末端结构域(绵羊与人类CRF1的22个差异残基中有18个)。还分离出了oCRF1变体(oCRF1var),其开放阅读框(ORF)从核苷酸(nt)1080至nt 1213缺失了133 bp,产生了一个1176 nt的新ORF,预测有一个392个残基的CRF1变体受体。133 bp缺失会导致在第七跨膜结构域(TM7)羧基端的第358位残基处发生移码,导致细胞质尾巴缩短,从第358位残基到392位残基有新的氨基酸序列。使用转染了oCRF1或oCRF1var 的Cos 7细胞制备的膜对饱和曲线进行Scatchard分析表明,野生型和变体受体的表达相似(CRF结合位点数量),且都以高亲和力结合oCRF [oCRF1(Kd):2.5 + 1.6 nM;oCRF1var:5.1 + 2.3 nM]。不可水解的GTP类似物(GTPγS)使野生型和变体oCRF1受体的亲和力降低到相似程度(oCRF1:18.2 nM;oCRF1var:22.4 nM)。与h/rCRF或α - 螺旋[9 - 41]oCRF相比,野生型和变体oCRF1受体对oCRF和刺鼠肽的选择性都大约高10倍。CRF能有效刺激瞬时转染野生型但不能刺激变体oCRF1受体的Cos 7细胞中cAMP的积累(EC50 = 51 pM)。在转染了oCRF1var的Cos 7细胞中,仅在所用的最高浓度oCRF(100 nM)下观察到cAMP积累。在转染了oCRF1var的Cos 7细胞(在存在2 mM异丁基甲基黄嘌呤的情况下)中,基础(未刺激)cAMP水平比野生型oCRF1低约50%。cAMP积累的差异不能归因于受体数量的差异,因为转染细胞中的总结合位点在野生型或变体oCRF1受体之间没有差异。激动剂诱导的受体内化,通过转染的Cos 7细胞耐酸部分中结合的总[125I]Tyr0 - oCRF的百分比来确定,野生型和变体oCRF1随时间(37℃下0 - 60分钟)都增加。与变体受体相比,野生型CRF1内化的总[125I]Tyr0 - oCRF结合百分比大约高2倍。总之,从成年绵羊垂体cDNA文库中克隆出了一个绵羊CRF1和一个CRF1细胞质尾巴受体变体,它们对oCRF具有高亲和力结合以及对oCRF相对于h/rCRF的选择性。GTPγS研究表明,变体和野生型受体都能有效地与Gαs偶联,然而,只有野生型oCRF1能够在生理水平的CRF下刺激cAMP产生。与野生型CRF1受体相比,激动剂诱导的绵羊CRF1var的内化也减少。我们认为oCRF1var与Gαs有效相互作用,但(激素结合后)不能有效刺激腺苷酸环化酶的G蛋白激活,这表明CRF1的细胞质尾巴可以调节与信号转导相关的受体功能。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验