Carrico C, Lebowitz R L
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Dec;28(12):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s002470050506.
To determine (1) the reasons for the frequently long delay in the diagnosis of an infrasphincteric ectopic ureter in girls, and (2) what role the radiologist can play in decreasing the delay.
Twelve girls were referred to our hospital from June 1994 until April 1997 for evaluation of constant urinary dribbling and/or vaginal discharge. Available imaging studies, radiology reports, and clinic notes were reviewed.
Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 6 years 7 months (range 2 years 10 months to 11 years 11 months). Mean delay until diagnosis after presentation was 2 years 5 months. Excluding the one girl whose ectopic ureter was diagnosed while she was still in diapers, mean age at the time of the first parental "complaint" was 4 years 9 months. The significance of the classic history of constant urinary dribbling was not recognized by physicians in 7 girls for 4 months to 7 years 10 months after presentation. Physical exam was not meticulously performed, as the ectopic orifice was visible in 8 of 12 girls. Imaging studies were ineffectively utilized: no imaging was done (for 2 years in 2 girls), inappropriate studies were done (ultrasound and voiding cystourethrography) and were misleading, studies were called normal when they were not (ultrasound and excretory urography), or perinatal imaging led to the incorrect assumption of a congenitally absent kidney in one girl and a multicystic dysplastic kidney in another. Excretory urography (EU) was diagnostic in all 10 girls with a duplex kidney, and computed tomography (CT) was supportive in 2 with a dysplastic kidney. CT was an adjunct in 3 girls; a Tc-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan was needed in 2.
The classic history of constant urinary dribbling in a successfully toilet-trained girl should immediately lead to an imaging search for the portion of kidney (or entire kidney) drained by an infrasphincteric ectopic ureter. EU should usually be the first imaging performed and is often the only imaging study needed.
确定(1)女童膀胱下异位输尿管诊断经常长期延迟的原因,以及(2)放射科医生在减少延迟方面可发挥的作用。
1994年6月至1997年4月,12名女童因持续性尿失禁和/或阴道分泌物被转诊至我院进行评估。回顾了现有的影像学检查、放射学报告和临床记录。
诊断时的平均年龄为6岁7个月(范围为2岁10个月至11岁11个月)。就诊后至诊断的平均延迟时间为2年5个月。排除1名在仍使用尿布时被诊断出异位输尿管的女童,首次家长“投诉”时的平均年龄为4岁9个月。7名女童在就诊后4个月至7年10个月期间,医生未认识到持续性尿失禁这一典型病史的重要性。体格检查未得到细致执行,因为12名女童中有8名可见异位开口。影像学检查未得到有效利用:未进行任何影像学检查(2名女童长达2年),进行了不恰当的检查(超声和排尿性膀胱尿道造影)且产生误导,检查结果正常时却被判定为正常(超声和排泄性尿路造影),或者围产期影像学检查导致1名女童被错误地假定为先天性肾缺如,另1名女童被错误地假定为多囊性发育不良肾。排泄性尿路造影(EU)对所有10名双肾女童均具有诊断价值,计算机断层扫描(CT)对2名发育不良肾女童具有辅助诊断价值。CT对3名女童起到辅助作用;2名女童需要进行锝-99m-二巯基丁二酸(DMSA)扫描。
成功接受如厕训练的女童出现持续性尿失禁的典型病史,应立即促使进行影像学检查,以寻找由膀胱下异位输尿管引流的肾脏部分(或整个肾脏)。EU通常应作为首选的影像学检查,且往往是唯一需要的影像学检查。