Iglehart J
Project Hope, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Acad Med. 1998 Dec;73(12):1241-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199812000-00012.
The latest meeting of the AAMC's Forum on the Future of Academic Medicine, on April 29, 1998, opened with a talk by Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, who reviewed the significant progress that the Human Genome Project (HGP) has made and speculated on how genetic discoveries and technologies would transform health-related research and ultimately the practice of medicine. The HGP's findings will offer clear improvements in diagnosis and prevention, and eventually in treatments, and the relationship between the academic medical center and the pharmaceutical industry will change--but remain good--as that industry applies the findings of the HGP. He stressed the need for the public and health care providers to develop a greater understanding of genetic issues, and urged changes in medical education to accomplish this. Forum members and Dr. Collins discussed the ethics and economics in patient care resulting from genetic research; forum members also asked whether academic medical centers could profit from genetic research findings. The second speaker was John Eisenberg, MD, administrator of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, which fosters health care research and disseminates to clinicians and others the findings of such research. Among other topics, Dr. Eisenberg described the new emphasis on health care outcomes and quality and described how his agency promotes research in these areas. Forum members asked who would pay for the information systems needed to communicate the findings of health services research and also noted that there is an expanding definition of health that places new pressures on already stressed academic medical centers, their missions, and their curricula, which must change. Michael Whitcomb, MD, of the AAMC, noted that the view that medical schools can't change their curricula has been proved wrong, and that 24 medical schools are working with the AAMC's Medical Schools Objectives Project on curricular reform. The forum closed with discussion of a few broader issues affecting academic medical centers.
1998年4月29日,美国医学协会学术医学未来论坛召开了最新会议。会议开场由国立人类基因组研究所所长弗朗西斯·S·柯林斯医学博士和哲学博士发表讲话。他回顾了人类基因组计划(HGP)取得的重大进展,并推测基因发现和技术将如何改变与健康相关的研究,以及最终如何改变医学实践。HGP的研究结果将在诊断和预防方面,最终在治疗方面带来明显改善,随着制药行业应用HGP的研究结果,学术医学中心与制药行业之间的关系将会改变,但仍将保持良好。他强调公众和医疗服务提供者需要对基因问题有更深入的了解,并敦促通过医学教育的变革来实现这一点。论坛成员与柯林斯博士讨论了基因研究在患者护理中引发的伦理和经济问题;论坛成员还询问学术医学中心是否能从基因研究成果中获利。第二位发言者是医疗保健政策与研究局局长约翰·艾森伯格医学博士,该局致力于促进医疗保健研究,并将此类研究结果传播给临床医生及其他人员。在其他议题中,艾森伯格博士阐述了对医疗保健结果和质量的新重视,并介绍了他所在机构如何推动这些领域的研究。论坛成员询问谁将为传播医疗服务研究结果所需的信息系统买单,还指出健康定义不断扩展,这给本已不堪重负的学术医学中心、其使命和课程带来了新的压力,这些都必须改变。美国医学协会的迈克尔·惠特科姆医学博士指出,认为医学院无法改变其课程的观点已被证明是错误的,有24所医学院正在与美国医学协会的医学院目标项目合作进行课程改革。论坛最后讨论了一些影响学术医学中心的更广泛问题。