Johnson K A, Little G A
Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA.
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):233-47.
The origin of the federal-state partnership in Maternal and Child Health (MCH) can be traced from the Children's Bureau grants of 1912, through the Sheppard-Towner Act, to the creation of Title V and other programs of today that mandate planning, accountability, and systems development. In the past decade with the transformation of the health care system and the emergence of managed care, there has been a resurgence of interest in public, professional, and governmental interest in quality measurement and accountability. Regional perinatal systems have been implemented in all states with varying levels of involvement by state health agencies and the public sector. This historical framework discusses two primary themes: the decades of evolution in the federal-state partnership, and the emergence in the last three decades of perinatal regional system policy, and suggests that the structure of the federal-state partnership has encouraged state variation. A survey of state MCH programs was undertaken to clarify their operational and perceived role in promoting quality improvement in perinatal care. Data and information from the survey, along with five illustrative state case studies, demonstrate great variation in how individual state agencies function. State efforts in quality improvement, a process to make things better, have four arenas of activity: policy development and implementation, definition and measurement of quality, data collection and analysis, and communication to affect change. Few state health agencies (through their MCH programs and perinatal staff) are taking action in all four arenas. This analysis concludes that there are improvements MCH programs could implement without significant expansion in their authority or resources and points out that there is an opportunity for states to be more proactive as they have the legal authority and responsibility for assuring MCH outcomes.
联邦政府与州政府在母婴健康(MCH)领域的合作起源可以追溯到1912年儿童局的拨款,历经《谢泼德 - 汤纳法案》,直至如今第五章及其他要求进行规划、问责和系统发展的项目的设立。在过去十年里,随着医疗保健系统的变革以及管理式医疗的出现,公共部门、专业人士和政府对质量衡量和问责的兴趣再度兴起。所有州都实施了区域围产期系统,州卫生机构和公共部门的参与程度各不相同。这一历史框架探讨了两个主要主题:联邦 - 州合作关系几十年的演变,以及过去三十年围产期区域系统政策的出现,并表明联邦 - 州合作关系的结构促使了各州之间的差异。对州母婴健康项目进行了一项调查,以阐明它们在促进围产期护理质量改进方面的运作及感知到的作用。调查所得的数据和信息,以及五个具有代表性的州案例研究,展示了各个州机构的运作方式存在巨大差异。各州在质量改进(一个使事情变得更好的过程)方面的努力有四个活动领域:政策制定与实施、质量的定义与衡量、数据收集与分析以及为影响变革而进行的沟通。很少有州卫生机构(通过其母婴健康项目和围产期工作人员)在所有这四个领域采取行动。该分析得出结论,母婴健康项目在无需大幅扩大其权力或资源的情况下即可实施一些改进,并指出各州有机会更加积极主动,因为它们拥有确保母婴健康成果的法律权力和责任。